Comparison of totally robotic and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng, Yi-ming [1 ]
Luo, Zi-yan [1 ]
Li, Zheng-yan [1 ]
Liu, Jia-jia [1 ]
Ren, Zhi-xiang [1 ]
Wang, Jun-jie [1 ]
Yu, Pei-wu [1 ]
Shi, Yan [1 ]
Zhao, Yong-liang [1 ]
Qian, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Ctr Minimally Invas Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Gen Surg, 30 Gao Tan Yan Rd, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 08期
关键词
Totally robotic gastrectomy; Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Short-term outcomes; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; ANASTOMOSIS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-10924-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background With the improvements in laparoscopic or robotic surgical techniques and instruments, a growing number of surgeons have attempted to complete all digestive tract reconstruction intracorporeally; these procedures include totally robotic gastrectomy (TRG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the TRG and compare the short-term outcomes of the TRG and TLG in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Between January 2018 and June 2023, 346 consecutive patients who underwent TRG or TLG at a high-volume academic gastric cancer specialty center were included. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding bias. The surgical outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and surgical burden were compared in PSM cohort. Results After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 194 patients (97 in each group) was included in the analysis. The total operation time of the TRG group was significantly longer than that of the TLG group (244.9 vs. 213.0 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the effective operation time between the 2 groups (217.8 vs. 207.2 min, P = 0.059). The digestive tract reconstruction time of the TRG group was significantly shorter than that of the TLG group (39.4 vs. 46.7 min, P < 0.001). The mean blood loss in the TRG group was less than that in the TLG group (101.1 vs. 126.8 mL, P = 0.014). The TRG group had more retrieved lymph nodes in the suprapancreatic area than that in the TLG group (16.6 vs 14.2, P = 0.002). The TRG group had a lower surgery task load index (38.9 vs. 43.1, P < 0.001) than the TLG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.4% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.691). Conclusion This study demonstrated that TRG is a safe and feasible procedure, and is preferable to TLG in terms of invasion and ergonomics. The TRG may maximize the superiority of robotic surgical systems and embodies the theory of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:4476 / 4484
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Roukos, Dimitrios H.
    Katsios, Christos
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3247 - 3248
  • [12] Comparison of Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Kim, Hee Sung
    Kim, Beom Su
    Lee, In Seob
    Lee, Sol
    Yook, Jeoung Hwan
    Kim, Byung Sik
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (04): : 323 - 331
  • [13] Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Okabe, Hiroshi
    Sunagawa, Hideki
    Saji, Masashi
    Hirai, Kenjiro
    Hisamori, Shigeo
    Tsunoda, Shigeru
    Obama, Kazutaka
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (05) : 803 - 811
  • [14] Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Hiroshi Okabe
    Hideki Sunagawa
    Masashi Saji
    Kenjiro Hirai
    Shigeo Hisamori
    Shigeru Tsunoda
    Kazutaka Obama
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 803 - 811
  • [15] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Western propensity score matched analysis
    Dias, Andre Roncon
    Pereira, Marina A.
    Ramos, Marcus F. K. P.
    de Oliveira, Rodrigo Jose
    Yagi, Osmar Kenji
    Ribeiro, Ulysses, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 130 (04) : 714 - 723
  • [16] Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Kong, Ying
    Cao, Shougen
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Li, Zequn
    Wang, Liankai
    Lu, Cunlong
    Shen, Shuai
    Zhu, Houxin
    Zhou, Yanbing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (03) : 531 - 539
  • [17] Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Ying Kong
    Shougen Cao
    Xiaodong Liu
    Zequn Li
    Liankai Wang
    Cunlong Lu
    Shuai Shen
    Houxin Zhu
    Yanbing Zhou
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2020, 24 : 531 - 539
  • [18] Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Uncut Roux-en-Y for gastric cancer may improve prognosis: A propensity score matching comparative study
    Chen, Yizhen
    Zheng, Tao
    Chen, Yifan
    Zheng, Yuanyuan
    Tan, Song
    Liu, Shaolin
    Zhou, Yuhang
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Chen, Weijie
    Mi, Yulong
    Lin, Shentao
    Yang, Changshun
    Li, Weihua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [19] Robotic gastrectomy is more beneficial for advanced than early-stage gastric cancer: a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy using propensity score matching
    Kuwabara, Shirou
    Kobayashi, Kazuaki
    Sudo, Natsuru
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (07): : 3799 - 3809
  • [20] Short- and long-term comparison of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by the same surgical team: a propensity score matching analysis
    Tian, Yulong
    Cao, Shougen
    Kong, Ying
    Shen, Shuai
    Niu, Zhaojian
    Zhang, Jian
    Chen, Dong
    Jiang, Haitao
    Lv, Liang
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Li, Zequn
    Zhong, Hao
    Zhou, Yanbing
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 185 - 195