Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

被引:1
作者
Chang, Michelle [1 ]
Weiss, Barry [2 ]
Worrell, Stephanie [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [3 ]
Ghaderi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
Readability; Health literacy; Foregut surgery; Patient education; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHealth literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.MethodsUsing Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.ResultsThe overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.ConclusionsThe American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:5259 / 5265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency
    Xie, Deborah X.
    Wang, Ray Y.
    Chinnadurai, Sivakumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 113 - 119
  • [42] Accessibility and readability of online patient education on cutaneous lymphomas
    Schreidah, Celine M.
    Fahmy, Lauren M.
    Lapolla, Brigit A.
    Gordon, Emily R.
    Kwinta, Bradley D.
    Geskin, Larisa J.
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 13 : 83 - 90
  • [43] Readability of Patient Education Materials in Hand Surgery and Health Literacy Best Practices for Improvement
    Hadden, Kristie
    Prince, Latrina Y.
    Schnaekel, Asa
    Couch, Cory G.
    Stephenson, John M.
    Wyrick, Theresa O.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (08): : 825 - 832
  • [44] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03) : 1048 - 1052
  • [45] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [46] Readability f Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008
    Zhang, Dafang
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Kilgallen, Elliott E.
    Blazar, Philip
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (02): : 186.e1 - 186.e8
  • [47] Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine
    Phan, Amy
    Jubril, Ayodeji
    Menga, Emmanuel
    Mesfin, Addisu
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E583 - E588
  • [48] The readability of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials
    Al Balushi, Mustafa
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Debenham, Brock
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (04) : 617 - 623
  • [49] Lost in Translation: The Readability Discrepancy of Online Patient Educational Materials for PCL Surgery
    Lin, Kuan-Yu
    Wang, Rena G.
    Hassan, Saleh
    Zhang, Andi
    Kaar, Scott G.
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2024, 12 (04): : 264 - 274
  • [50] Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric ACL Tears
    Thomas, Nicholas D.
    Mahler, Raegan
    Rohde, Matthew
    Segovia, Nicole
    Shea, Kevin G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 43 (09) : 549 - 554