Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Michelle [1 ]
Weiss, Barry [2 ]
Worrell, Stephanie [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [3 ]
Ghaderi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
Readability; Health literacy; Foregut surgery; Patient education; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHealth literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.MethodsUsing Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.ResultsThe overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.ConclusionsThe American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:5259 / 5265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (02): : E146 - E151
  • [22] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Karimi, Amir H.
    Shah, Aakash K.
    Hecht II, Christian J.
    Burkhart, Robert J.
    Acuna, Alexander J.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : 1392 - 1399
  • [23] Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials
    Patel, Chirag R.
    Cherla, Deepa V.
    Sanghvi, Saurin
    Baredes, Soly
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (10): : 1421 - 1425
  • [24] Readability of Online Patient Information Relating to Cleft Palate Surgery
    Lavin, Christopher V.
    Fahy, Evan J.
    Abbas, Darren B.
    Griffin, Michelle
    Deleon, Nestor M. Diaz
    Lee, Daniel K.
    Khosla, Rohit K.
    Bruckman, Karl
    Lorenz, Hermann Peter
    Wan, Derrick C.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (03) : 330 - 335
  • [25] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information on Adolescent Bariatric Surgery
    Armaun D. Rouhi
    Yazid K. Ghanem
    Gerard D. Hoeltzel
    William S. Yi
    Joy L. Collins
    Elizabeth Parks Prout
    Noel N. Williams
    Kristoffel R. Dumon
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 397 - 399
  • [26] Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment
    Pearson, Keon
    Ngo, Summer
    Ekpo, Eson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Baird, Grayson
    Knowles, Joshua
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [27] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Interventional Pain Procedures
    Kamath, Dilip
    Mcintyre, Sean
    Peskin, Evan
    Stratman, Scott
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Kamath, Preetha D.
    Gupta, Raghav
    Schwartz, Ruben
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    Urits, Ivan
    Viswanath, Omar
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Horn, Danielle B.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [28] Readability and reliability of online patient education materials about statins
    Ngo, Summer
    Asirvatham, Roshini
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Maron, David J.
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 16
  • [29] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information on Adolescent Bariatric Surgery
    Rouhi, Armaun D.
    Ghanem, Yazid K.
    Hoeltzel, Gerard D.
    Yi, William S.
    Collins, Joy L.
    Prout, Elizabeth Parks
    Williams, Noel N.
    Dumon, Kristoffel R.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (01) : 397 - 399
  • [30] Readability of online dermatology patient education resources
    Natarelli, Nicole
    Nguyen, Lynn
    Botto, Elizabeth
    Coughlin, Emily
    Krenitsky, Amanda
    Albers, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024, 38 (11) : e917 - e919