Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Michelle [1 ]
Weiss, Barry [2 ]
Worrell, Stephanie [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [3 ]
Ghaderi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
Readability; Health literacy; Foregut surgery; Patient education; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHealth literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.MethodsUsing Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.ResultsThe overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.ConclusionsThe American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:5259 / 5265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Gynecomastia
    Nnamani Silva, Ogonna N.
    Ammanuel, Simon G.
    Segobiano, Brett M.
    Edwards, Caleb S.
    Hoffman, William Y.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (02) : 123 - 125
  • [12] Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia
    Joseph, Pradeep
    Silva, Nicole A.
    Nanda, Anil
    Gupta, Gaurav
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E934 - E938
  • [13] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials on Atrial Fibrillation
    Siddiqui, Emaad
    Shah, Aakash
    Sambol, Justin
    Waller, Alfonso H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [14] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Adam Timothy Lucy
    Stephanie L. Rakestraw
    Courtney Stringer
    Daniel Chu
    Jayleen Grams
    Richard Stahl
    Margaux N. Mustian
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6519 - 6525
  • [15] Readability assessment of Spanish online patient education materials in gynecologic oncology
    Thomas, Dionna
    Ratnaparkhi, Rubina
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 56
  • [16] Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Neophallus Reconstruction
    Paidisetty, Praneet
    Sathyanarayanan, Sairandri
    Wang, Leonard Kuan-Pei
    Slaughter, Kristen
    Freet, Daniel
    Greives, Matthew
    Chen, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 291 : 296 - 302
  • [17] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Lucy, Adam Timothy
    Rakestraw, Stephanie L. L.
    Stringer, Courtney
    Chu, Daniel
    Grams, Jayleen
    Stahl, Richard
    Mustian, Margaux N. N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6519 - 6525
  • [18] Readability and Content of Patient Education Material Related to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Strachan, Patricia H.
    de Laat, Sonya
    Carroll, Sandra L.
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Vaandering, Katie
    Toor, Gurjit K.
    Arthur, Heather M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2012, 27 (06) : 495 - 504
  • [19] Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Ayoub, Samantha
    Tsui, Edmund
    Mohammed, Taariq
    Tseng, Joseph
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2019, 27 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [20] Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
    Hoang, Peter Minh
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (02)