Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Michelle [1 ]
Weiss, Barry [2 ]
Worrell, Stephanie [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [3 ]
Ghaderi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
Readability; Health literacy; Foregut surgery; Patient education; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHealth literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.MethodsUsing Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.ResultsThe overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.ConclusionsThe American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:5259 / 5265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material
    Kapoor, Karan
    George, Praveen
    Evans, Matthew C.
    Miller, Weldon J.
    Liu, Stanley S.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 138 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [2] The readability of online patient education materials on maxillomandibular advancement surgery
    Khan, Sofia
    Walters, Rameen K.
    Walker, Angelica M.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Liu, Stanley Y.
    Tremont, Timothy J.
    Abdelwahab, Mohamed A.
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2024, 28 (02) : 745 - 751
  • [3] Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources
    Luciani, A. Michael
    Foster, Brian K.
    Hayes, Daniel
    DelSole, Edward M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E640 - E644
  • [4] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [5] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [6] Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    Hoang, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (04) : 1051 - 1056
  • [7] Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers
    Choudhery, Sadia
    Xi, Yin
    Chen, Heng
    Aboul-Fettouh, Nader
    Goldenmerry, YPaul
    Ho, Charles
    Viroslav, Hannah
    Zhang, Chelsea
    Goudreau, Sally
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (10) : 1245 - 1251
  • [8] Readability of Online Foot and Ankle Surgery Patient Education Materials
    Hartnett, Davis A.
    Philips, Alexander P.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Blankenhorn, Brad D.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2025, 18 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [9] Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish
    Ghahremani, Jacob S.
    Ogi, Jenna E.
    Kody, Michael T.
    Navarro, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (10) : 2220 - 2229
  • [10] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences
    Baldwin, Alexander J.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (07): : 1146 - 1153