On the scale-up criteria for bubble columns

被引:40
作者
Besagni G. [1 ]
Gallazzini L. [1 ]
Inzoli F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4a, Milano
关键词
Bubble column; Gas holdup; Gas sparger; Liquid phase properties; Scale-up;
D O I
10.1016/j.petlm.2017.12.005
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is generally admitted that experimental data obtained in “laboratory-scale” bubble columns are representative of “industrial-scale” reactors if the well-known three “Wilkinson et al. scale-up criteria” are satisfied: (a) the diameter of the bubble column is larger than 0.15 m, (b) the sparger openings are larger than 1–2 mm and (c) the aspect ratio is larger than 5. The aim of this communication is to contribute to the existing discussion. To this end, this communication collects relevant experimental investigation and include new experimental data: in particular, we have experimentally studied the combined effect of the aspect ratio (within the range of 1–15) and the sparger design (considering both “coarse” and “fine” spargers) on the gas holdup in a large-diameter and large-scale gas-liquid bubble column. The bubble column has been operated both in the batch mode and in the counter-current mode. Filtered air has been used as the gaseous phase in all the experiments, while the liquid phase has included deionized water and different aqueous solutions of organic (i.e., ethanol) and inorganic (i.e., sodium chloride, NaCl) active agents. It is found that the “Wilkinson et al. scale-up criteria” are valid for the air-water case in the batch mode for “very-coarse” spargers. Conversely, they are no more valid when considering different liquid velocity, and/or aqueous solutions of active agents, and other sparger openings. © 2019 Southwest Petroleum University
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Majumder S.K., Hydrodynamics and Transport Processes of Inverse Bubbly Flow, (2016)
[2]  
Shaikh A., Al-Dahhan M., Scale-up of bubble column reactors: a review of current state-of-the-art, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, pp. 8091-8108, (2013)
[3]  
Rzehak R., Modeling of mass-transfer in bubbly flows encompassing different mechanisms, Chem. Eng. Sci., 151, pp. 139-143, (2016)
[4]  
Wilkinson P.M., Spek A.P., van Dierendonck L.L., Design parameters estimation for scale-up of high-pressure bubble columns, AIChE J., 38, pp. 544-554, (1992)
[5]  
Sasaki S., Hayashi K., Tomiyama A., Effects of liquid height on gas holdup in air–water bubble column, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 72, pp. 67-74, (2016)
[6]  
Sasaki S., Uchida K., Hayashi K., Tomiyama A., Effects of column diameter and liquid height on gas holdup in air-water bubble columns, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 82, pp. 359-366, (2017)
[7]  
Besagni G., Inzoli F., Comprehensive experimental investigation of counter-current bubble column hydrodynamics: holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and local flow properties, Chem. Eng. Sci., 146, pp. 259-290, (2016)
[8]  
Besagni G., Inzoli F., De Guido G., Pellegrini L.A., The dual effect of viscosity on bubble column hydrodynamics, Chem. Eng. Sci., 158, pp. 509-538, (2017)
[9]  
Besagni G., Inzoli F., Influence of internals on counter-current bubble column hydrodynamics: holdup, flow regime transition and local flow properties, Chem. Eng. Sci., 145, pp. 162-180, (2016)
[10]  
Kitscha J., Kocamustafaogullari G., Breakup criteria for fluid particles, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow, 15, pp. 573-588, (1989)