Five years on: analysis of university lecturers' experiences of the French government's health promotion education program

被引:0
作者
Monpierre, Mathilde [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Frachon, Adele [4 ]
Eguiluz, Alexandra [5 ,6 ]
Martinot, Pauline [5 ,7 ,8 ]
Tenenbaum, Annabelle [1 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Paris Sorbonne Paris Nord Univ, Educ & Hlth Promot Lab, UFR Hlth Med Human Biol, UR 3412, F-93000 Bobigny, France
[2] CHU Guadeloupe, Serv Accueil Urgences, SAMU, SMUR, F-97159 Guadeloupe, France
[3] Univ Antilles, F-97157 Guadeloupe, France
[4] Univ Paris Cite, Dept Med Gen, F-75006 Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Cite, F-75006 Paris, France
[6] Learning Planet Inst, F-75004 Paris, France
[7] Paris Saclay Univ, NeuroSpin Ctr, Cognit Neuroimaging Unit, CEA,INSERM, ,G-Yvette, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[8] Paris Sci Lettres Univ, Coll France, F-75231 Paris, France
[9] Univ Paris Cite, UFR Odontol, F-75006 Paris, France
[10] Grp Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, APHP, Dept Oral & Dent Med, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
University lecturers' experiences; Health students; Prevention; Health promotion; Education; Health curriculum;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05755-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe National Health Promotion Intervention Program by Student (HPIPS) is a French government educational program introduced in 2018, aiming at developing all health students' health promotion knowledge and abilities, as well as implementing health promotion interventions for specific subpopulations in the general public. Its pedagogical framework was elaborated in 2018 and then evaluated by the French Council for Public Health in 2022, highlighting certain difficulties for the program to be homogeneously implemented in France. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the experiences and feedback of university lecturers in charge of this HPIPS training.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with HPIPS lecturers from various health fields and from French universities, and a qualitative content analysis was carried out.ResultsFourteen interviews were conducted during the autumn of 2022 with HPIPS program university lecturers including five doctors, three dentists, two nurses, two pharmacists, one midwife, and one physiotherapist from eight different towns belonging to six regions. Depending on the professional background, the component, and the local resources available, the teaching experience varied from one lecturer to another. A number of difficulties arose in setting up this educational program and complying with the latter legislation. The work overload was considerable, and the lecturers' heavy commitments some lecturers to be discouraged, especially since some lecturers were not trained in health promotion abilities. Although interprofessionality was a strength of this HPIPS, it was also its main challenge. Pedagogical innovations were developed, notably through the use of digital technology; cross-disciplinary collaboration was established; and lecturers-students specific boundaries have emerged thanks to this health promotion project.ConclusionsIn France, setting up the HPIPS rapidly was experienced as a real pedagogical challenge for the interviewed university lecturers. While most of them noted the positive and beneficial contributions made by the introduction of prevention and health promotion intervention skills for health students, they also shared recommendations in order to match the ambitions and increase the HPIPS impact on the development of a culture of prevention and health promotion among health students.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Using experiential learning and authentic assessments to support students to become competent health promotion practitioners
    Anderson, Karen
    Gupta, Sabrina
    Buenfil, Fernanda Nava
    Verrinder, Glenda
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 33 : 27 - 34
  • [2] Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
    Biggs, J
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [3] Blanchet A, 2017, L'entretien
  • [4] Student Health Service : anchoring health education in the students' curriculum
    Chapron, Anthony
    Metten, Marie-Astrid
    Maury, Arnaud
    Prestel, Thierry
    Bajeux, Emma
    Andres, Emilie
    de Boumonville, Catherine
    Fiquet, Laure
    Mathieu, Romain
    Degeilh, Brigitte
    Besnier, Melanie
    Bastian, Benjamin
    Hurel, Cynthia
    Hauser, Helene
    Garlantezec, Ronan
    Bellissant, Eric
    [J]. SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2021, 33 (03): : 407 - 413
  • [5] Denzin NK., 2000, diteurs. Handbook of qualitative research, V2, P1065
  • [6] Drapeau M., 2004, Pratiques pyschologiques, V10, P79, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PRPS.2004.01.004
  • [7] Fayard A., 2008, Promot Educ mars, V15, P31, DOI [10.1177/1025382308093995, DOI 10.1177/1025382308093995]
  • [8] Fortin M.F., 2016, Fondements et etapes du processus de recherche: methodes quantitatives et qualitatives, V3e
  • [9] Given LM., 2008, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412963909
  • [10] HCSP, 2024, Rapport de l'HCSP