Harvesting Losses for a Cut-and-Chip Harvesting System Operating in Willow Short-Rotation Coppice

被引:0
作者
Eisenbies, Mark H. [1 ]
Volk, Timothy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Sustainable Resources Management, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
short rotation coppice; willow biomass; harvesting losses; agricultural and forestry waste biomass; WOODY CROPS; SINGLE-PASS; PRODUCTIVITY; PLANTATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/en17071541
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In any short-rotation coppice (SRC) operation, a certain percentage of harvestable material is unrecovered, which contributes to harvesting system losses. This material may be in the form of merchantable and non-merchantable components. These losses affect economics but also influence yield, nutrient cycling, and carbon sequestration. There are very few estimates for harvesting losses available in the literature, and they are limited by small sample sizes. The objective of this work was to provide a broad overview of harvesting losses in willow SRC over a wide range of standing biomass and harvesting conditions. The average total harvesting losses were between 3 and 4 Mg ha-1, which is between 6 and 7 percent of the standing biomass. Losses can spike to nearly 40% on less than 3% of the area. Harvesting losses are significantly, but weakly, correlated with increased standing biomass. These results highlight the complexity and variability in harvesting losses as well as which aspects of harvesting systems might be targeted to reduce or partition material losses. These results have implications for designing machinery and economic modeling of these systems.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ASABE, 2011, Uniform Terminology for Agricultural Machinery ManagementASABE Standards S495.1 NOV2005(R2011), P2
[2]  
Ashton M.S., 2018, PRACTICE SILVICULTUR
[3]   Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: One-process versus two-process harvest operation [J].
Berhongaray, G. ;
El Kasmioui, O. ;
Ceulemans, R. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 58 :333-342
[4]   Biomass allometry for alder, dwarf birch, and willow in boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of far northeastern Siberia and north-central Alaska [J].
Berner, Logan T. ;
Alexander, Heather D. ;
Loranty, Michael M. ;
Ganzlin, Peter ;
Mack, Michelle C. ;
Davydov, Sergei P. ;
Goetz, Scott J. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 337 :110-118
[5]   A spatial assessment of potential biomass for bioenergy in Australia in 2010, and possible expansion by 2030 and 2050 [J].
Crawford, Debbie F. ;
O'Connor, Michael H. ;
Jovanovic, Tom ;
Herr, Alexander ;
Raison, Robert John ;
O'Connell, Deborah A. ;
Baynes, Tim .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (04) :707-722
[6]   Aboveground biomass equations for black willow (Salix nigra Marsh.) and eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh.) [J].
Dahal, Bini ;
Poudel, Krishna P. ;
Renninger, Heidi J. ;
Granger, Joshua J. ;
Leininger, Theodor D. ;
Gardiner, Emile S. ;
Souter, Ray A. ;
Rousseau, Randall J. .
TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2022, 7
[7]   Environmental limitation mapping of potential biomass resources across the conterminous United States [J].
Daly, Christopher ;
Halbleib, Michael D. ;
Hannaway, David B. ;
Eaton, Laurence M. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2018, 10 (10) :717-734
[8]  
de Souza D.P.L., 2020, Ph.D. Thesis
[9]   Growing Season Harvests of Shrub Willow (Salix spp.) Have Higher Nutrient Removals and Lower Yields Compared to Dormant-Season Harvests [J].
De Souza, Daniel P. ;
Eisenbies, Mark H. ;
Volk, Timothy A. .
FORESTS, 2022, 13 (11)
[10]   Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: Then and now [J].
Dickmann, Donald I. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (8-9) :696-705