Non-lesional epilepsy does not necessarily convey poor outcomes after invasive monitoring followed by resection or thermal ablation

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare outcomes including seizure-free status at the last follow-up in adult patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy identified as lesional vs. non-lesional based on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings who underwent invasive evaluation followed by subsequent resection or thermal ablation (LiTT).MethodsWe identified 88 adult patients who underwent intracranial monitoring between 2014 and 2021. Of those, 40 received resection or LiTT, and they were dichotomized based on MRI findings, as lesional (N = 28) and non-lesional (N = 12). Patient demographics, seizure characteristics, non-invasive interventions, intracranial monitoring, and surgical variables were compared between the groups. Postsurgical seizure outcome at the last follow-up was rated according to the Engel classification, and postoperative seizure freedom was determined by Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. Statistical analyses employed Fisher's exact test to compare categorical variables, while a t-test was used for continuous variables.ResultsThere were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups except for more often noted PET abnormality in the lesional group (p = 0.0003). 64% of the lesional group and 57% of the non-lesional group received surgical resection or LiTT (p = 0.78). At the last follow-up, 78.5% of the patients with lesional MRI findings achieved Engel I outcomes compared to 66.7% of non-lesional patients (p = 0.45). Kaplan-Meier curves did not show a significant difference in seizure-free duration between both groups after surgical intervention (p = 0.49).SignificanceIn our sample, the absence of lesion on brain MRI was not associated with worse seizure outcomes in adult patients who underwent invasive intracranial monitoring followed by resection or thermal ablation.