Exploring Comprehension Strategies of Modular Process Models: A Combined Eye-Tracking and Concurrent Think-Aloud Study

被引:3
作者
Bass, Julia [1 ]
Winter, Michael [2 ]
Pryss, Ruediger [2 ]
Reichert, Manfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Databases & Informat Syst, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Clin Epidemiol & Biometry, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
process model; modularization; comprehensibility; eye-tracking; think-aloud; study; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; COMPLEXITY; UNDERSTANDABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/brainsci14040303
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study of complex process models often encounters challenges in terms of comprehensibility. This paper explores using modularization as a strategy to mitigate such challenges, notably the reduction in complexity. Previous research has delved into the comprehensibility of modularized process models, yet an unresolved question about the cognitive factors at play during their comprehension still needs to be answered. Addressing the latter, the paper presents findings from an innovative study combining eye-tracking and concurrent think-aloud techniques involving 25 participants. The study aimed to comprehend how individuals comprehend process models when presented in three different modular formats: flattened process models, models with grouped elements, and models with subprocesses. The results shed light on varying comprehension strategies employed by participants when navigating through these modularized process models. The paper concludes by suggesting avenues for future research guided by these insights.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Exploring how users engage with hybrid process artifacts based on declarative process models: a behavioral analysis based on eye-tracking and think-aloud [J].
Abbad Andaloussi, Amine ;
Zerbato, Francesca ;
Burattin, Andrea ;
Slaats, Tijs ;
Hildebrandt, Thomas T. ;
Weber, Barbara .
SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2021, 20 (05) :1437-1464
[2]  
[Anonymous], Willkommen Bei LimeSurvey
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, BUSINESS PROCESS MOD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Information TechnologyObject Management Group Business Process Model and Notation
[5]   A systematic literature review on modular product design [J].
Bonvoisin, Jeremy ;
Halstenberg, Friedrich ;
Buchert, Tom ;
Stark, Rainer .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2016, 27 (07) :488-514
[6]  
Figl Kathrin, 2011, Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Proceedings 23rd International Conference, CAiSE 2011, P452, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_34
[7]   Optimal modularity: a demonstration of the evolutionary advantage of modular architectures [J].
Frenken, Koen ;
Mendritzki, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2012, 22 (05) :935-956
[8]   Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data [J].
Gerjets, Peter ;
Kammerer, Yvonne ;
Werner, Benita .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2011, 21 (02) :220-231
[9]   Reducing the Cognitive Complexity of Business Process Models [J].
Gruhn, Volker ;
Laue, Ralf .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, 2009, :339-345
[10]  
Jalali A, 2014, LECT NOTES BUS INF P, V194, P231