Prediction of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma using MRI histogram analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xianwang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yuzhu [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Hong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Junlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Cuiyingmen 82, Lanzhou 730030, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Int Sci & Technol Cooperat Base Med Imaging, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Med Imaging Gansu Prov, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Gansu Prov Canc Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, 2 East Xiaoxihu St, Lanzhou 730050, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat sen Univ, Gansu Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, 2 East Xiaoxihu St, Lanzhou 730050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Glioblastoma; O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; Magnetic resonance imaging; Histogram analysis; TEMOZOLOMIDE; BIOMARKER; BENEFIT; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-024-02522-w
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histogram parameters in predicting O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (pMGMT) methylation status in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM). From November 2021 to July 2023, forty-six IDH-wildtype GBM patients with known pMGMT methylation status (25 unmethylated and 21 methylated) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRI signs (including location, across the midline, margin, necrosis/cystic changes, hemorrhage, and enhancement pattern) were assessed and recorded. Histogram parameters were extracted and calculated by Firevoxel software based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CET1). Differences and diagnostic performance of conventional MRI signs and histogram parameters between the pMGMT-unmethylated and pMGMT-methylated groups were analyzed and compared. No differences were observed in the conventional MRI signs between pMGMT-unmethylated and pMGMT-methylated groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with the pMGMT-methylated group, pMGMT-unmethylated showed a higher minimum, mean, Perc.01, Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, Perc.50, and coefficient of variation (CV) (all p < 0.05). Among all significant CET1 histogram parameters, minimum achieved the best distinguishing performance, with an area under the curve of 0.836. CET1 histogram parameters could provide additional value in predicting pMGMT methylation status in patients with IDH-wildtype GBM, with minimum being the most promising parameter.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation-mediated sensitivity to temozolomide in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: Is there a link?
    Weller, M.
    Gramatzki, D.
    Felsberg, J.
    Hentschel, B.
    Wolter, M.
    Schackert, G.
    Westphal, M.
    Regli, L.
    Thon, N.
    Tatagiba, M.
    Wick, W.
    Schlegel, U.
    Krex, D.
    Roth, P.
    Rushing, E.
    Pietsch, T.
    von Deimling, A.
    Sabel, M.
    Loeffler, M.
    Reifenberger, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S396 - S396
  • [2] Glioblastoma Recurrence and the Role of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation
    Storey, Katie
    Leder, Kevin
    Hawkins-Daarud, Andrea
    Swanson, Kristin
    Ahmed, Atique U.
    Rockne, Russell C.
    Foo, Jasmine
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2019, 3 : 1 - 12
  • [3] O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Is a Novel Negative Effector of Invasion in Glioblastoma Multiforme
    Chahal, Manik
    Abdulkarim, Bassam
    Xu, Yaoxian
    Guiot, Marie-Christine
    Easaw, Jacob C.
    Stifani, Nicolas
    Sabri, Siham
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 11 (11) : 2440 - 2450
  • [4] The Clinical Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients With Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Yu-Hang
    Wang, Ze-Fen
    Cao, Chang-Jun
    Weng, Hong
    Xu, Cheng-Shi
    Li, Kai
    Li, Jie-Li
    Lan, Jing
    Zeng, Xian-Tao
    Li, Zhi-Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [5] O6-methylguanine methyltransferase promoter methylation status of glioblastoma cell line clonal population
    Anan, Mitsuhiro
    Del Maestro, Rolando Fausto
    Hata, Nobuhiro
    Fujiki, Minoru
    NEUROPATHOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [6] Variation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in serial samples in glioblastoma
    Parkinson, Jonathon F.
    Wheeler, Helen R.
    Clarkson, Adele
    McKenzie, Catriona A.
    Biggs, Michael T.
    Little, Nicholas S.
    Cook, Raymond J.
    Messina, Marinella
    Robinson, Bruce G.
    McDonald, Kerrie L.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 87 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [7] Relationship between glioblastoma location and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation percentage
    Sansone, Giulio
    Lombardi, Giuseppe
    Maccari, Marta
    Gaiola, Matteo
    Pini, Lorenzo
    Cerretti, Giulia
    Guerriero, Angela
    Volpin, Francesco
    Denaro, Luca
    Corbetta, Maurizio
    Salvalaggio, Alessandro
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (06)
  • [8] O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and promoter methylation status in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma
    Yeager, ND
    Dolan, ME
    Gastier, JM
    Gross, TG
    Delaney, S
    Frick, J
    Ruymann, FB
    Ewesuedo, R
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2003, 25 (12) : 941 - 947
  • [9] Non-invasive determination of the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in glioblastoma (GBM) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    Rathore, Saima
    Bakas, Spyridon
    Nasrallah, MacLean P.
    Bagley, Stephen Joseph
    Akbari, Hamed
    Ha, Sung Min
    Mamourian, Elizabeth Claire
    Watt, Christopher D.
    Davatzikos, Christos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [10] Variation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in serial samples in glioblastoma
    Jonathon F. Parkinson
    Helen R. Wheeler
    Adele Clarkson
    Catriona A. McKenzie
    Michael T. Biggs
    Nicholas S. Little
    Raymond J. Cook
    Marinella Messina
    Bruce G. Robinson
    Kerrie L. McDonald
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2008, 87 : 71 - 78