Validating Digital Earth Australia NBART for the Landsat 9 Underfly of Landsat 8

被引:2
作者
Byrne, Guy [1 ]
Broomhall, Mark [1 ]
Walsh, Andrew J. [1 ]
Thankappan, Medhavy [1 ]
Hay, Eric [1 ]
Li, Fuqin [1 ]
McAtee, Brendon [2 ]
Garcia, Rodrigo [3 ]
Anstee, Janet [4 ]
Kerrisk, Gemma [5 ]
Drayson, Nathan [5 ]
Barnetson, Jason [6 ]
Samford, Ian [6 ]
Denham, Robert [7 ]
机构
[1] Geosci Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave & Hindmarsh Dr, Symonston, ACT 2609, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Earth & Planetary Sci, Remote Sensing & Satellite Res Grp, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Earth Sci, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] CSIRO Entomol, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[5] CSIRO Environm, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[6] Queensland Dept Environm & Sci, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Landsat; 8; 9; surface reflectance; validation; underfly; SURFACE REFLECTANCE; BRDF CORRECTION; FIELD; SPECTROSCOPY; CALIBRATION; RADIANCE; SENSORS; SYSTEM; ETM+; OLI;
D O I
10.3390/rs16071233
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, Geoscience Australia has undertaken a successful continental-scale validation program, targeting Landsat and Sentinel analysis-ready data surface reflectance products. The field validation model used for this program was successfully built upon earlier studies, and the measurement uncertainties associated with these protocols have been quantified and published. As a consequence, the Australian earth observation community was well-prepared to respond to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) call for collaborators with the 2021 Landsat 8 (L8) and Landsat 9 (L9) underfly. Despite a number of challenges, seven validation datasets were captured across five sites. As there was only a single 100% overlap transit across Australia, and the country was amidst a strong La Nina climate cycle, it was decided to deploy teams to the two available overpasses with only 15% side lap. The validation sites encompassed rangelands, chenopod shrublands, and a large inland lake. Apart from instrument problems at one site, good weather enabled the capture of high-quality field data allowing for meaningful comparisons between the radiometric performance of L8 and L9, as well as the USGS and Australian Landsat analysis-ready data processing models. Duplicate (cross-calibration) spectral sampling at different sites provides evidence of the field protocol reliability, while the off-nadir view of L9 over the water site has been used to better compare the performance of different water and atmospheric correction processing models.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows [J].
Aasen, Helge ;
Honkavaara, Eija ;
Lucieer, Arko ;
Zarco-Tejada, Pablo J. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (07)
[2]   Multi-temporal high-resolution imaging spectroscopy with hyperspectral 2D imagers - From theory to application [J].
Aasen, Helge ;
Bolten, Andreas .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 205 :374-389
[3]   On the reproducibility of field-measured reflectance factors in the context of vegetation studies [J].
Anderson, K. ;
Dungan, J. L. ;
MacArthur, A. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (08) :1893-1905
[4]  
Barry P. S., 2002, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V4480, P242, DOI 10.1117/12.453346
[5]   Effects of Per-Pixel Variability on Uncertainties in Bathymetric Retrievals from High-Resolution Satellite Images [J].
Botha, Elizabeth J. ;
Brando, Vittorio E. ;
Dekker, Arnold G. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (06)
[6]   The Potential of Autonomous Ship-Borne Hyperspectral Radiometers for the Validation of Ocean Color Radiometry Data [J].
Brando, Vittorio E. ;
Lovell, Jenny L. ;
King, Edward A. ;
Boadle, David ;
Scott, Roger ;
Schroeder, Thomas .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (02)
[7]  
Byrne G., 2022, DEA ANAL READY DATA, DOI [10.26186/145101, DOI 10.26186/145101]
[8]  
Campbell S, 2001, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P2593, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2001.978099
[9]  
Dekker AG, 2001, RE S D I PR, V4, P307
[10]  
Doelling D., 2017, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, P475, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10329-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10329-X]