Hierarchical Characteristics of River Network in Hanjiang Basin

被引:0
作者
Huang Z. [1 ]
Wang Y. [1 ]
Ni J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences (MOE), Department of Environmental Engineering, Peking University, Beijing
来源
Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis | 2021年 / 57卷 / 02期
关键词
Hanjiang basin; River network; River width; Self-similarity; Stream-order;
D O I
10.13209/j.0479-8023.2021.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The structural characteristics of river network in the Hanjiang basin were investigated based on the extracted high-precision digital river network. Combined with surface water frequency maps and river width remote sensing datasets, we analyzed the self-similarity of geometric and topological structure of the river network, as well as the hierarchical characteristics of river width. The results show that convergences of bifurcation ratio, river length ratio, area ratio, and side-branching ratio happen to rivers at stream-orders 1-6, which implies that geometric and topological self-similarity of river networks was fairly fitted at stream orders of 1-6. Moreover, the statistics of hierarchical characteristics of river width show that within the range of self-similar stream-orders, the average river width presents an approximate exponential distribution. The river width ratio is relatively stable at stream-orders 1-6 and the average value is 1.87, indicating that Horton's law is applicable to river width. By comparing the river network parameters before and after exclusion of pseudo-rivers, it is found that rivers with smaller stream-order, length, width and basin area are more likely to dry up, leading to the deviations of the real river network from the structure of self-similarity. © 2021 Peking University.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 360
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Widder S, Besemer K, Singer G A, Et al., Fluvial network organization imprints on microbial co-occurrence networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 35, pp. 12799-12804, (2014)
  • [2] Sklar L S, Dietrich W E, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Et al., Do gravel bed river size distributions record channel network structure?, Water Resources Research, 42, 6, pp. 770-775, (2006)
  • [3] Hotchkiss E R, Hall R O, Sponseller R A, Et al., Sources of and processes controlling CO<sub>2</sub> emissions change with the size of streams and rivers, Nature Geoscience, 8, 9, pp. 696-699, (2015)
  • [4] Hette-Tronquart N, Belliard J, Tales E, Et al., Stable isotopes reveal food web modifications along the upstream-downstream gradient of a temperate stream, Aquatic Sciences, 78, 2, pp. 255-265, (2016)
  • [5] Czuba J A, Foufoula-Georgiou E., Dynamic connec-tivity in a fluvial network for identifying hotspots of geomorphic change, Water Resources Research, 51, 3, pp. 1401-1421, (2015)
  • [6] Goren L., A theoretical model for fluvial channel response time during time-dependent climatic and tectonic forcing and its inverse applications, Geophy-sical Research Letters, 43, 20, pp. 10753-10763, (2016)
  • [7] Shelef E, Hilley G E., Symmetry, randomness, and process in the structure of branched channel networks, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 10, pp. 3485-3493, (2014)
  • [8] Willett S D, McCoy S W, Perron J T, Et al., Dynamic reorganization of river basins, Science, 343, (2014)
  • [9] Abed-Elmdoust A, Miri M A, Singh A., Reorganiza-tion of river networks under changing spatiotemporal precipitation patterns: An optimal channel network approach, Water Resources Research, 52, 11, pp. 8845-8860, (2016)
  • [10] Ranjbar S, Hooshyar M, Singh A, Et al., Quantifying climatic controls on river network branching structure across scales, Water Resources Research, 54, 10, pp. 7347-7360, (2018)