Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality

被引:0
|
作者
Huebner, Gesche M. [1 ]
Fell, Michael J. [2 ]
Watson, Nicole E. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Environm Energy & Resources, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London, England
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
energy; open data and code; open science; preprints; preregistration; quality; reporting guidelines; reproducibility; research practices; transparency; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; DATA-COLLECTION; IMPACT; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; CODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy use is of crucial importance for the global challenge of climate change, and also is an essential part of daily life. Hence, research on energy needs to be robust and valid. Other scientific disciplines have experienced a reproducibility crisis, i.e. existing findings could not be reproduced in new studies. The 'TReQ' approach is recommended to improve research practices in the energy field and arrive at greater transparency, reproducibility and quality. A highly adaptable suite of tools is presented that can be applied to energy research approaches across this multidisciplinary and fast-changing field. In particular, the following tools are introduced - preregistration of studies, making data and code publicly available, using preprints, and employing reporting guidelines - to heighten the standard of research practices within the energy field. The wider adoption of these tools can facilitate greater trust in the findings of research used to inform evidence-based policy and practice in the energy field.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research transparency and reproducibility policies and programmes at the international initiative for impact evaluation
    Grant, Sean
    Khatua, Sayak
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 2024, 16 (03) : 363 - 373
  • [22] Understanding experiments and research practices for reproducibility: an exploratory study
    Samuel, Sheeba
    Koenig-Ries, Birgitta
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [23] Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols
    Peat, George
    Riley, Richard D.
    Croft, Peter
    Morley, Katherine I.
    Kyzas, Panayiotis A.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Perel, Pablo
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Schroter, Sara
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Hemingway, Harry
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (07)
  • [24] Evidence Quality, Transparency, and Translucency for Replication in Information Systems Survey Research
    Kakhki, Mohammad Daneshvar
    Mousavi, Reza
    Palvia, Prashant
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 49 : 57 - 85
  • [25] How to assess the quality and transparency of energy scenarios: Results of a case study
    Junne, Tobias
    Xiao, Mengzhu
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Zongfei
    Jochem, Patrick
    Pregger, Thomas
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 26
  • [26] Explorations and Practices Combining Real Situations, Improving Graduate Students Teaching and Guidance Quality
    Xu Xiao-nan
    EDUCATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 2 : 198 - 201
  • [27] Better living through transparency: Improving the reproducibility of fMRI results through comprehensive methods reporting
    Carp, Joshua
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 13 (03) : 660 - 666
  • [28] Improving rigor and reproducibility in cardiovascular research
    Lindsey, Merry L.
    Leblanc, Amanda J.
    Bertrand, Luc
    Bradshaw, Amy D.
    Kleinbongard, Petra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 325 (04): : H866 - H868
  • [29] Improving Replicability, Reproducibility, And Reliability In Preclinical Research: A Shared Responsibility
    Cheleuitte-Nieves, Christopher
    Lipman, Neil S.
    ILAR JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (02) : 113 - 119
  • [30] Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research
    Avidan, Michael S.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Mashour, George A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 122 (04) : 413 - 420