Environmental impact of concrete containing high volume fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag

被引:40
作者
Singh, G. V. P. Bhagath [1 ]
Prasad, V. Durga [1 ]
机构
[1] SRM Univ AP, Dept Civil Engn, Amaravati, India
关键词
Characterisation; Low cement content; High volume fly ash and GGBS concrete; Environmental impact; Cradle; -to; -gate; Cost analysis; CALCIUM-SILICATE-HYDRATE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; GLASSY PHASE DISSOLUTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; C-S-H; X-RAY; CEMENT; TEMPERATURE; STRENGTH; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141729
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concrete production is energy -intensive and has an adverse impact on the environment due to the raw materials involved. Currently, India has abundant reserves of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). Despite various applications, fly ash often ends up in landfills. Given its abundance, there is a growing interest in utilising substantial quantities of fly ash in concrete production. In the current study, M30 -grade concrete is designed with very high levels of fly ash and GGBS. Additionally, quick lime (QL) is incorporated as a supplementary agent to augment lime content. A total of twenty concrete mixes have been developed with different combinations of fly ash, GGBS, and QL. Results illustrate that the addition of QL does not show overall strength improvement to the GGBS-based mixes, but it impacts on fly ash -based mixes. The targeted design strength is achieved with 70% cement replacement with fly ash and QL. The strength development depends on the pozzolanic reaction initiated and the formation of hydration products in the system. The environmental impact of concrete is assessed by analysing its life cycle assessment using a cradle -to -gate approach. The energy requirement and kg-CO2 eq. emissions depend on the level of cement replacement. The fly ash -based concrete emits less kg-CO2 eq. and requires less energy than the GGBS-based mixes. Overall, the designed strength is achieved with 65% fly ash, requiring 59% less energy, reducing 54% CO2 footprint, 56% GWP100, 80% HTPinf, 46% ODPinf, and cost by 34% compared to OPC-based concrete.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Composition and density of nanoscale calcium-silicate-hydrate in cement [J].
Allen, Andrew J. ;
Thomas, Jeffrey J. ;
Jennings, Hamlin M. .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2007, 6 (04) :311-316
[2]   Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete [J].
Alsalman, Ali ;
Assi, Lateef N. ;
Kareem, Rahman S. ;
Carter, Kealy ;
Ziehl, Paul .
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 3 (03)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BEST AVAILABLE TECHN, DOI DOI 10.2788/12850
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, IS.456, p91.100.30
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IS 10262: 2019
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IS 383
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, IS:12089-1987, P1
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Summary for Policymakers: Synthesis Report., Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, CEA Report