Machine learning algorithms to predict outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
dos Santos, Adriano Lages [1 ,2 ]
Pinhati, Clara [1 ]
Perdigao, Jonathan [1 ]
Galante, Stella [1 ]
Silva, Ludmilla [1 ]
Veloso, Isadora [1 ]
Silva, Ana Cristina Simoes [1 ]
Oliveira, Eduardo Araujo [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Hlth Sci Postgrad Program, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Minas Gerais IFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
MODELS; RISK; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102824
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: We aimed to analyze the study designs, modeling approaches, and performance evaluation metrics in studies using machine learning techniques to develop clinical prediction models for children and adolescents with COVID-19. Methods: We searched four databases for articles published between 01/01/2020 and 10/25/2023, describing the development of multivariable prediction models using any machine learning technique for predicting several outcomes in children and adolescents who had COVID-19. Results: We included ten articles, six (60 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.31 - 0.83]) were predictive diagnostic models and four (40% [95 % CI 0.170.69]) were prognostic models. All models were developed to predict a binary outcome (n= 10/10, 100 % [95 % CI 0.72-1]). The most frequently predicted outcome was disease detection (n=3/10, 30% [95 % CI 0.11-0.60]). The most commonly used machine learning models in the studies were tree -based (n=12/33, 36.3% [95 % CI 0.170.47]) and neural networks (n=9/27, 33.2% [95% CI 0.15-0.44]). Conclusion: Our review revealed that attention is required to address problems including small sample sizes, inconsistent reporting practices on data preparation, biases in data sources, lack of reporting metrics such as calibration and discrimination, hyperparameters and other aspects that allow reproducibility by other researchers and might improve the methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] How does the model make predictions? A systematic literature review on the explainability power of machine learning in healthcare
    Allgaier, Johannes
    Mulansky, Lena
    Draelos, Rachel Lea
    Pryss, Ruediger
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 143
  • [2] Predictive models for hospital readmission risk: A systematic review of methods
    Artetxe, Arkaitz
    Beristain, Andoni
    Grana, Manuel
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 164 : 49 - 64
  • [3] Beam AL, 2018, JAMA, V319, P1317, DOI [DOI 10.1001/JAMA.2017.18391, 10.1001/jama.2017.18391]
  • [4] Bennett M., 2022, Artif. Intell. Annu., DOI [10.5772/intechopen.105116, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.105116]
  • [5] Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
    Bouwmeester, Walter
    Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
    Mallett, Susan
    Geerlings, Mirjam I.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)
  • [6] Predicting South Korean adolescents vulnerable to obesity after the COVID-19 pandemic using categorical boosting and shapley additive explanation values: A population-based cross-sectional survey
    Byeon, Haewon
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [7] External validation of Machine Learning models for COVID-19 detection based on Complete Blood Count
    Campagner, Andrea
    Carobene, Anna
    Cabitza, Federico
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [8] Modeling the Spread of COVID-19 Infection Using a Multilayer Perceptron
    Car, Zlatan
    Baressi Segota, Sandi
    Andelic, Nikola
    Lorencin, Ivan
    Mrzljak, Vedran
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 2020 (2020)
  • [9] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [10] Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
    Collins, Gary S.
    Dhiman, Paula
    Andaur Navarro, Constanza L.
    Ma, Ji
    Hooft, Lotty
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Logullo, Patricia
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Peng, Lily
    Van Calster, Ben
    van Smeden, Maarten
    Riley, Richard D.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):