Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review

被引:1
作者
Wang, Mawson [1 ,2 ]
Seibel, Markus J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, ANZAC Res Inst, Bone Res Program, Concord Campus,Hosp Rd,Gate 3, Concord, NSW, Australia
[2] Concord Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Concord, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Fracture liaison service; Fracture prevention; Osteoporosis; Primary care; Secondary fracture prevention; IMPROVE OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; HIP FRACTURE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; LIAISON SERVICE; SUBSEQUENT FRACTURE; TRAUMA FRACTURE; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-024-07036-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The global burden of osteoporosis continues to rise with an ageing population. Untreated osteoporotic fractures not only heighten the risk of subsequent fractures but are associated with excess mortality. Although primary care guidelines consistently stress the importance of secondary fracture prevention, fewer than 20% of patients are appropriately treated for osteoporosis following an initial osteoporotic fracture. This worldwide phenomenon is known as the osteoporosis care gap. This literature review examines the barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care and evaluates the effectiveness of targeted primary care interventions. Common themes emerged from the majority of qualitative studies, including a need for improved communication between the hospital team and primary care, better defined responsibilities and osteoporosis-directed education for the primary care physicians. Quantitative studies demonstrated that most targeted, intensive interventions aimed at educating patients and their primary care physician about osteoporosis treatment significantly increased rates of investigation and treatment. Greater uptake of models of secondary fracture prevention in primary care is urgently needed to address the osteoporosis care gap.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1376
页数:18
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
American Orthopaedic Association, 2024, OWN BON BELM IL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ESA/P/WP/248
[3]  
Arai H, 2019, CLIN STANDARDS FRACT
[4]  
Australian Fragility Fracture Foundation, 2024, AUSTR FRAG FRACT FDN
[5]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2014, ESTIMATING PREVALENC
[6]   The Importance of Recent Prevalent Fracture Site for Imminent Risk of Fracture - A Retrospective, Nationwide Cohort Study of Older Swedish Men and Women [J].
Axelsson, Kristian F. ;
Litsne, Henrik ;
Lorentzon, Mattias .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2023, 38 (06) :851-859
[7]   Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study [J].
Bennett, Michael J. ;
Center, Jacqueline R. ;
Perry, Lin .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 34 (07) :1249-1262
[8]   The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial [J].
Bessette, L. ;
Davison, K. S. ;
Jean, S. ;
Roy, S. ;
Ste-Marie, L. G. ;
Brown, J. P. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (12) :2963-2972
[9]   A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures [J].
Bliuc D. ;
Eisman J.A. ;
Center J.R. .
Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 (9) :1309-1317
[10]   Mortality Risk Associated With Low-Trauma Osteoporotic Fracture and Subsequent Fracture in Men and Women [J].
Bliuc, Dana ;
Nguyen, D. Nguyen ;
Milch, Vivienne E. ;
Nguyen, Tuan V. ;
Eisman, John A. ;
Center, Jacqueline R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (05) :513-521