How work-family conflict affects employees' well-being in Chinese hotels: the moderating effects of Spouses' work-family conflict and gender

被引:1
作者
Fan, Xinqiao [1 ]
Tian, Siyu [2 ]
Chen, Tingting [1 ]
Zhou, Jianhua [3 ]
Mao, Zhenxing [4 ]
Lu, Zhenglan [5 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Business & Tourism Inst, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Huzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Collins Coll Hospitality Management, Pomona, CA USA
[5] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Entrepreneurship, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
WFC; SWFC; Gender; Employees' well-being; JOB DEMANDS AFFECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; CROSSOVER; SPILLOVER; STRESS; EXHAUSTION; CULTURE; MODEL; LIFE; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-024-05914-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Drawing on the spillover-crossover model and gender role theory, this study aims to uncover the antecedents of employees' well-being by investigating a three-way interaction between employees' work-family conflict (WFC), spousal WFC (SWFC), and employee gender. Paired samples of 239 hotel employees and their spouses in China were recruited as study respondents. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to test the hypotheses. Findings showed that WFC had a significant negative correlation with employees' well-being. In addition, SWFC significantly moderated the relationship between WFC and employees' well-being. The interaction between WFC and gender did not display a significant effect. The triple interaction of WFC, gender, and SWFC significantly influenced employees' well-being. This study incorporates familial factors (i.e., SWFC) and individual factors (i.e., gender) into a single framework to examine the joint effects of multiple boundary conditions. This work expands exploration of the boundary conditions of WFC in predicting employees' well-being. Findings also enrich the understanding of gender differences at the family and individual levels.
引用
收藏
页码:21308 / 21321
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction [J].
Adams, GA ;
King, LA ;
King, DW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (04) :411-420
[2]   Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes [J].
Anderson, SE ;
Coffey, BS ;
Byerly, RT .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 28 (06) :787-810
[3]   Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents [J].
Aryee, S ;
Srinivas, ES ;
Tan, HH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (01) :132-146
[4]   Role stressors, interrole conflict, and well-being: The moderating influence of spousal support and coping behaviors among employed parents in Hong Kong [J].
Aryee, S ;
Luk, V ;
Leung, A ;
Lo, S .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 54 (02) :259-278
[5]  
Bakker AB, 2013, CURR ISS WORK ORGAN, P54
[6]   How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Dollard, Maureen F. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (04) :901-911
[7]   THE CONTAGION OF STRESS ACROSS MULTIPLE ROLES [J].
BOLGER, N ;
DELONGIS, A ;
KESSLER, RC ;
WETHINGTON, E .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1989, 51 (01) :175-183
[8]   A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents [J].
Byron, K .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 67 (02) :169-198
[9]   Work-Family Enrichment and Job Performance: A Constructive Replication of Affective Events Theory [J].
Carlson, Dawn ;
Kacmar, K. Michele ;
Zivnuska, Suzanne ;
Ferguson, Merideth ;
Whitten, Dwayne .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 16 (03) :297-312
[10]   Double Crossed: The Spillover and Crossover Effects of Work Demands on Work Outcomes Through the Family [J].
Carlson, Dawn S. ;
Thompson, Merideth J. ;
Kacmar, K. Michele .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 104 (02) :214-228