Effectiveness of and preference for a picture-based home office ergonomics assessment compared to a traditional in-person office ergonomics assessment: A case study from a Canadian University during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
|
作者
Diesbourg, Tara L. [1 ,3 ]
McAllister, Megan J. [2 ,3 ]
Costigan, Patrick A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, Publ & Environm Wellness, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Queens Ergonom Consulting Program, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Virtual Ergonomics Assessment; Repeatability; Reliability; Bland-Altman; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; Rapid Office Strain Assessment; WORK; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104261
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
During the COVID-19 pandemic, telework best practices decreased in importance compared to the need for social distancing. It is important that ergonomics assessments for home office workstations are equally as effective as assessment for traditional offices to maintain teleworker wellbeing. The purpose of this case study is to compare a remote, picture-based, home office assessment to a traditional, in-person, office assessment for employees of one Canadian University. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman Analyses (BAAs) revealed that the two methods provide repeatable results, with good agreement. Feedback from the participants suggested that picture-based assessments were as effective as in-person assessments; but that picture-based assessments could be improved with video conferencing to discuss findings and ask follow-up questions. Participants found value in remote assessments and, while they preferred in-person assessments, picture-based assessments are suitable when needed as they allow for many assessments to be completed without violating social distancing restrictions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据