Consumer Preferences for a Healthcare Appointment Reminder in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:1
作者
Selim, Shayma Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
Senanayake, Sameera [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mcphail, Steven M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Carter, Hannah E. [1 ,2 ]
Naicker, Sundresan [1 ,2 ]
Kularatna, Sanjeewa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Australian Ctr Hlth Serv Innovat, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, 60 Musk Ave, Brisbane, Qld 4159, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Healthcare Transformat, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, 60 Musk Ave, Brisbane, Qld 4159, Australia
[3] Duke NUS Med Sch, Hlth Serv & Syst Res, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Metro South Hlth, Digital Hlth & Informat Directorate, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; NON-ATTENDANCE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; ELICIT PREFERENCES; ECONOMICS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00692-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is essential to consider the evidence of consumer preferences and their specific needs when determining which strategies to use to improve patient attendance at scheduled healthcare appointments. Objectives This study aimed to identify key attributes and elicit healthcare consumer preferences for a healthcare appointment reminder system. Methods A discrete choice experiment was conducted in a general Australian population sample. The respondents were asked to choose between three options: their preferred reminder (A or B) or a 'neither' option. Attributes were developed through a literature review and an expert panel discussion. Reminder options were defined by four attributes: modality, timing, content and interactivity. Multinomial logit and mixed multinomial logit models were estimated to approximate individual preferences for these attributes. A scenario analysis was performed to estimate the likelihood of choosing different reminder systems. Results Respondents (n = 361) indicated a significant preference for an appointment reminder to be delivered via a text message (beta = 2.42, p < 0.001) less than 3 days before the appointment (beta = 0.99, p < 0.001), with basic details including the appointment cost (beta = 0.13, p < 0.10), and where there is the ability to cancel or modify the appointment (beta = 1.36, p < 0.001). A scenario analysis showed that the likelihood of choosing an appointment reminder system with these characteristics would be 97%. Conclusions Our findings provide evidence on how healthcare consumers trade-off between different characteristics of reminder systems, which may be valuable to inform current or future systems. Future studies may focus on exploring the effectiveness of using patient-preferred reminders alongside other mitigation strategies used by providers.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 550
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Preference based scheduling in a healthcare provider network [J].
Agrawal, Deepak ;
Pang, Guodong ;
Kumara, Soundar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 307 (03) :1318-1335
[2]   A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a liver screening programme in Queensland, Australia: a mixed methods study to select attributes and levels [J].
Allen, Michelle J. ;
Doran, Rachael ;
Brain, David ;
Powell, Elizabeth E. ;
O'Beirne, James ;
Valery, Patricia C. ;
Barnett, Adrian ;
Hettiarachchi, Ruvini ;
Hickman, Ingrid J. ;
Kularatna, Sanjeewa .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
[3]  
[Anonymous], Secure Cloud Strategy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ngene 1.2 User Manual and Reference Guide ChoiceMetrics
[5]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, CENS ALL PERS QUICKS
[6]  
Australian Communications and Media Authority, 2022, COMMUN MEDIA AUST, V2022, P56
[7]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022, DIG HLTH
[8]   The economics of non-attendance and the expected effect of charging a fine on non-attendees [J].
Bech, M .
HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 74 (02) :181-191
[9]   How scheduling systems with automated appointment reminders improve health clinic efficiency [J].
Boone, Claire E. ;
Celhay, Pablo ;
Gertler, Paul ;
Gracner, Tadeja ;
Rodriguez, Josefina .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 82
[10]   Methodology to derive preference for health screening programmes using discrete choice experiments: a scoping review [J].
Brain, David ;
Jadambaa, Amarzaya ;
Kularatna, Sanjeewa .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)