Superior suppression of serum estrogens during neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment with letrozole compared to exemestane

被引:1
|
作者
Bertelsen, Bjorn-Erik [1 ]
Almas, Bjorg [1 ]
Fjermeros, Kamilla [2 ]
Viste, Kristin [1 ]
Geisler, Stephanie Beate [2 ]
Sauer, Torill [3 ,4 ]
Selsas, Knut [5 ]
Geisler, Juergen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Med Biochem & Pharmacol, Hormone Lab, Bergen, Norway
[2] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Lorenskog, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, Lorenskog, Norway
关键词
Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant; Aromatase; Letrozole; Exemestane; Estrogens; NONSTEROIDAL AROMATASE INHIBITOR; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; ESTRONE SULFATE; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; ANASTROZOLE; PLASMA; ESTRADIOL; AROMATIZATION; TISSUE; ENDOCRINE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-024-07313-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The aromatase inhibitor letrozole and the aromatase inactivator exemestane are two of the most pivotal cancer drugs used for endocrine treatment of ER-positive breast cancer in all phases of the disease. Although both drugs inhibit CYP19 (aromatase) and have been used for decades, a direct head-to-head, intra-patient-cross-over comparison of their ability to decrease estrogen synthesis in vivo is still lacking. Methods Postmenopausal breast cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy were randomized to receive either letrozole (2.5 mg o.d.) or exemestane (25 mg o.d.) for an initial treatment period, followed by a second treatment period on the alternative drug (intra-patient cross-over study design). Serum levels of estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), letrozole, exemestane, and 17-hydroxyexemestane were quantified simultaneously using a novel, ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS method established in our laboratory. Results Complete sets of serum samples (baseline and during treatment with letrozole or exemestane) were available from 79 patients, including 40 patients starting with letrozole (cohort 1) and 39 with exemestane (cohort 2). Mean serum estrone and estradiol levels in cohort 1 were 174 pmol/L and 46.4 pmol/L at baseline, respectively. Treatment with letrozole suppressed serum E1 and E2 to a mean value of 0.2 pmol/L and 0.4 pmol/L (P < 0.001). After the cross-over to exemestane, mean serum levels of E1 and E2 increased to 1.4 pmol/L and 0.7 pmol/L, respectively. In cohort 2, baseline mean serum levels of E1 and E2 were 159 and 32.5 pmol/L, respectively. Treatment with exemestane decreased these values to 1.8 pmol/L for E1 and 0.6 pmol/L for E2 (P < 0.001). Following cross-over to letrozole, mean serum levels of E1 and E2 were significantly further reduced to 0.1 pmol/L and 0.4 pmol/L, respectively. Serum drug levels were monitored in all patients throughout the entire treatment and confirmed adherence to the protocol and drug concentrations within the therapeutic range for all patients. Additionally, Ki-67 values decreased significantly during treatment with both aromatase inhibitors, showing a trend toward a stronger suppression in obese women. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, we present here for the first time a comprehensive and direct head-to-head, intra-patient-cross-over comparison of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole and the aromatase inactivator exemestane concerning their ability to suppress serum estrogen levels in vivo. All in all, our results clearly demonstrate that letrozole therapy results in a more profound suppression of serum E1 and E2 levels compared to exemestane.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 358
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phase II randomized trial of neoadjuvant metformin plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole for estrogen receptor positive postmenopausal breast cancer (METEOR)
    Kim, Jisun
    Lim, Woosung
    Kim, Eun-Kyu
    Kim, Min-Kyoon
    Paik, Nam-Sun
    Jeong, Sang-Seol
    Yoon, Jung-han
    Park, Chan Heun
    Ahn, Sei Hyun
    Kim, Lee Su
    Han, Sehwan
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Kang, Han-Sung
    Kim, Seung Il
    Yoo, Young Bum
    Jeong, Joon
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Kang, Taewoo
    Kim, Sung-Won
    Jung, Yongsik
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    Kim, Ku Sang
    Yu, Jong-Han
    Chae, Byung Joo
    Jung, So-Youn
    Kang, Eunyoung
    Choi, Su Yun
    Moon, Hyeong-Gon
    Noh, Dong-Young
    Han, Wonshik
    BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [42] Phase II Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Everolimus Plus Letrozole Compared With Placebo Plus Letrozole in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Baselga, Jose
    Semiglazov, Vladimir
    van Dam, Peter
    Manikhas, Alexey
    Bellet, Meritxell
    Mayordomo, Jose
    Campone, Mario
    Kubista, Ernst
    Greil, Richard
    Bianchi, Giulia
    Steinseifer, Jutta
    Molloy, Betty
    Tokaji, Erika
    Gardner, Humphrey
    Phillips, Penny
    Stumm, Michael
    Lane, Heidi A.
    Dixon, J. Michael
    Jonat, Walter
    Rugo, Hope S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (16) : 2630 - 2637
  • [43] Effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels, joint pain, and fatigue in women starting adjuvant letrozole treatment for breast cancer
    Khan, Qamar J.
    Reddy, Pavan S.
    Kimler, Bruce F.
    Sharma, Priyanka
    Baxa, Susan E.
    O'Dea, Anne P.
    Klemp, Jennifer R.
    Fabian, Carol J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [44] Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in primary breast cancer - Review of literature
    Mathew, J.
    Asgeirsson, K. S.
    Jackson, L. R.
    Cheung, K. L.
    Robertson, J. F. R.
    BREAST, 2009, 18 (06) : 339 - 344
  • [45] Implication of environmental estrogens on breast cancer treatment and progression
    Gonzalez, Thomas L.
    Rae, James M.
    Colacino, Justin A.
    TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 421 : 41 - 48
  • [46] The Present and Future of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Treatment
    Marti, Covadonga
    Sanchez-Mendez, Jose Ignacio
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [47] FemZone trial: a randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant letrozole and zoledronic acid with letrozole in primary breast cancer patients
    Peter A Fasching
    Sebastian M Jud
    Maik Hauschild
    Sherko Kümmel
    Martin Schütte
    Matthias Warm
    Volker Hanf
    Dieter Grab
    Jutta Krocker
    Elmar Stickeler
    Rolf Kreienberg
    Thomas Müller
    Thorsten Kühn
    Christopher Wolf
    Steffen Kahlert
    Stefan Paepke
    Michael Berghorn
    Mathias Muth
    Monika Baier
    Birgit Wackwitz
    Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
    Matthias W Beckmann
    Michael P Lux
    BMC Cancer, 14
  • [48] Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone-positive Breast Cancer, Focusing on Ovarian Suppression and Extended Treatment: An Update
    Glassman, Daniel
    Hignett, Sue
    Rehman, Shazza
    Linforth, Richard
    Salhab, Mohamed
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (10) : 5329 - 5341
  • [49] Impact of letrozole supplementation during ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    Sonigo, Charlotte
    Sermondade, Nathalie
    Calvo, Jeremy
    Benard, Julie
    Sifer, Christophe
    Grynberga, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2019, 4
  • [50] Current status and future potential role of exemestane in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer (Review)
    Crucitta, E
    Fornier, MN
    Locopo, N
    Silvestris, N
    Lorusso, V
    De Lena, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) : 1283 - 1288