Impact of governance on resilience in the energy transition. An analysis of China and Germany

被引:4
|
作者
Ye, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chaiyapa, Warathida [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Sch Publ Policy, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Guangdong Ocean Univ, Sch Management, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhanjiang Presch Educ Coll, 88-1 Haibin North Av, Zhanjiang 524000, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy resilience; Governance; State-centric; FRAMEWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jup.2024.101732
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a critical historic juncture of energy transition, energy resilience under the COVID-19 crisis and the RussianUkraine war will profoundly influence the energy sector and global climate. The research compared China and Germany as representatives of two modes of energy governance -state -centric and market -centric, respectively -to investigate their ability to maintain resilience amid the recent global turbulences. Policy reviews and discourse analysis of online interviews were conducted to understand the role of governance in three dimensions of resilience. The study found that energy resilience differed between state -centric and market -centric energy governance. The distributed power structure in market -centric governance promotes adaption and transformation, whereas a state -centric structure is more effective in responding to immediate disruptions and implementing larger -scale centralized renewable deployment. As energy policy is an element within and characterized by governance, understanding how governance would affect resilience can help policymakers of the two systems improve resilience and formulate policies that align stakeholders' expectations in the quest for the low -carbon transition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy technical resilience assessment based on complex network analysis - A case study of China
    Su, Rui
    Chen, Bin
    Wang, Saige
    Duan, Cuncun
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 364
  • [22] Comparison of Governance in Disaster Prevention and Management System between Germany and China
    Li, Yanfang
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 8: REGIONAL ANALYSIS, 2009, : 401 - 405
  • [23] Stakeholders' perceptions of hydrogen and reflections on energy transition governance
    Parente, Cristina
    Teixeira, Francisca
    Cerdeira, Jorge
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [24] Internet governance in China: a content analysis
    Yang, Feng
    Mueller, Milton L.
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 7 (04) : 446 - 465
  • [25] How state governance can offer a new paradigm to energy transition in Indian agriculture?
    Chatterjee, Riti
    ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 185
  • [26] Analysis of generation cost changes during China's energy transition
    Qiang, Wenli
    Niu, Shuwen
    Liu, Xiaojie
    Wang, Xiang
    Jia, Zhuo
    Dai, Runqi
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 29 (04) : 456 - 472
  • [27] National stances and governance systems: a comparative study of low carbon governance in Germany, the United States, and China
    Tan, Rong
    Zhu, Yujie
    GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 3 (02): : 219 - 242
  • [28] Is there any room for renewable energy innovation in developing and transition economies? Data envelopment analysis of energy behaviour and resilience data
    Aldieri, Luigi
    Gatto, Andrea
    Vinci, Concetto Paolo
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 186
  • [29] Regional Electricity Models for Community Energy in Germany: The Role of Governance Structures
    Ehrtmann, Moritz
    Holstenkamp, Lars
    Becker, Timon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 24
  • [30] Multilevel governance for building energy conservation in rural China
    Sha, Kaixun
    Wu, Shaoyan
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2016, 44 (5-6) : 619 - 629