Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos

被引:2
|
作者
Chin, Alexis Heng Boon [1 ]
Nguma, Jean-Didier Bosenge [2 ]
Ahmad, Mohd Faizal [3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Fertil & IVF Consultancy Pvt Ltd, 531A Upper Cross St,04-95 Hong Lim Complex, Chinatown 051531, Singapore
[2] Kisangani Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kisangani, DEM REP CONGO
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Adv Reprod Ctr ARC, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
CRISPR-Cas9; Ethics; Patient enrolment; Monogenic disorders; Preimplantation embryo; Gene therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-024-03125-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Germline genome editing of IVF embryos is controversial because it is not directly health or lifesaving but is intended to prevent genetic diseases in yet-unborn future offspring. The following criteria are thus proposed for future clinical trials: (i) Due to medical risks, there should be cautious and judicious application while avoiding any non-essential usage, with rigorous patient counseling. (ii) Genome editing should only be performed on the entire batch of IVF embryos without initial PGT screening if all of them are expected to be affected by genetic disease. (iii) When there is a fair chance that some IVF embryos will not be affected by genetic diseases, initial PGT screening must be performed to identify unaffected embryos for transfer. (iv) IVF embryos with carrier status should not undergo germline genome editing. (v) If patients fail to conceive after the transfer of unaffected embryos, they should undergo another fresh IVF cycle rather than opt for genome editing of their remaining affected embryos. (vi) Only if the patient is unable to produce any more unaffected embryos in a fresh IVF cycle due to advanced maternal age or diminished ovarian reserves, can the genome editing of remaining affected embryos be permitted as a last resort.
引用
收藏
页码:1727 / 1731
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Germline genome editing of human IVF embryos should not be subject to overly stringent restrictions
    Smith, Kevin Richard
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (07) : 1733 - 1737
  • [2] Genome Editing Should Preferably Be Carried Out on Fetuses In Utero Rather Than IVF Embryos RESPONSE
    Chin, Alexis Heng Boon
    Sun, Ningyu
    Yang, Jiao
    JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2025,
  • [3] Human Germline Genome Editing
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Mortlock, Douglas P.
    Scholes, Derek T.
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Brody, Lawrence C.
    Faucett, W. Andrew
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Hercher, Laura
    Isasi, Rosario
    Middleton, Anna
    Musunuru, Kiran
    Shriner, Daniel
    Virani, Alice
    Young, Caroline E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2017, 101 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [4] Human germline genome editing
    Lea, Rebecca A.
    Niakan, Kathy K.
    NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2019, 21 (12) : 1479 - 1489
  • [5] Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China†
    Peng, Yaojin
    Lv, Jianwei
    Ding, Lulu
    Gong, Xia
    Zhou, Qi
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2022, 107 (01) : 261 - 268
  • [6] Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit
    Sparrow, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (09) : 4 - 15
  • [7] Risks and benefits of human germline genome editing: An ethical analysis
    Rubeis G.
    Steger F.
    Asian Bioethics Review, 2018, 10 (2) : 133 - 141
  • [8] Thinking the unthinkable: how did human germline genome editing become ethically acceptable?
    Martin, Paul A.
    Turkmendag, Ilke
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2021, 40 (04) : 384 - 405
  • [9] Genome editing of human embryos for research purposes: Japanese lay and expert attitudes
    Akatsuka, Kyoko
    Hatta, Taichi
    Sawai, Tsutomu
    Fujita, Misao
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [10] Does human germline genome editing violate human dignity? An African perspective
    Shozi, Bonginkosi
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 8 (01):