Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos

被引:4
作者
Chin, Alexis Heng Boon [1 ]
Nguma, Jean-Didier Bosenge [2 ]
Ahmad, Mohd Faizal [3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Fertil & IVF Consultancy Pvt Ltd, 531A Upper Cross St,04-95 Hong Lim Complex, Chinatown 051531, Singapore
[2] Kisangani Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kisangani, DEM REP CONGO
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Adv Reprod Ctr ARC, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
CRISPR-Cas9; Ethics; Patient enrolment; Monogenic disorders; Preimplantation embryo; Gene therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-024-03125-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Germline genome editing of IVF embryos is controversial because it is not directly health or lifesaving but is intended to prevent genetic diseases in yet-unborn future offspring. The following criteria are thus proposed for future clinical trials: (i) Due to medical risks, there should be cautious and judicious application while avoiding any non-essential usage, with rigorous patient counseling. (ii) Genome editing should only be performed on the entire batch of IVF embryos without initial PGT screening if all of them are expected to be affected by genetic disease. (iii) When there is a fair chance that some IVF embryos will not be affected by genetic diseases, initial PGT screening must be performed to identify unaffected embryos for transfer. (iv) IVF embryos with carrier status should not undergo germline genome editing. (v) If patients fail to conceive after the transfer of unaffected embryos, they should undergo another fresh IVF cycle rather than opt for genome editing of their remaining affected embryos. (vi) Only if the patient is unable to produce any more unaffected embryos in a fresh IVF cycle due to advanced maternal age or diminished ovarian reserves, can the genome editing of remaining affected embryos be permitted as a last resort.
引用
收藏
页码:1727 / 1731
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A society-wide conversation is needed about germline genome editing using CRISPR [J].
Birney, Ewan .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (01) :30-32
[2]   Intrinsic deletion at 10q23.31, including the PTEN gene locus, is aggravated upon CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome engineering in HAP1 cells mimicking cancer profiles [J].
Geng, Keyi ;
Merino, Lara G. ;
Veiga, Raul G. ;
Sommerauer, Christian ;
Epperlein, Janine ;
Brinkman, Eva K. ;
Kutter, Claudia .
LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE, 2023, 7 (02)
[3]   Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective [J].
Khan, Mohammad A. Z. ;
Konje, Justin C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 232 :5-9
[4]   Ten ways in which He Jiankui violated ethics [J].
Krimsky, Sheldon .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (01) :18-20
[5]  
Kubikova N, 2023, HUM REPROD, V38, DOI [10.1093/humrep/dead093.089, 10.1093/humrep/dead093.089, DOI 10.1093/HUMREP/DEAD093.089]
[6]   Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing [J].
Lander, Eric ;
Baylis, Francoise ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Charpentier, Emmanuelle ;
Berg, Paul .
NATURE, 2019, 567 (7747) :165-168
[7]   Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction [J].
Madero, Jose I. ;
Manotas, Maria C. ;
Garcia-Acero, Mary ;
Caceres, Andrea Lopez ;
Jaimes, Claudia Lopez .
MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 75 (03) :260-272
[8]   Ethical considerations of preconception and prenatal gene modification in the embryo and fetus [J].
Mattar, Citra Nurfarah Zaini ;
Labude, Markus Klaus ;
Lee, Timothy Nicholas ;
San Lai, Poh .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (12) :3018-3027
[9]   Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [J].
Mehravar, Maryam ;
Shirazi, Abolfazl ;
Nazari, Mahboobeh ;
Banan, Mehdi .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 445 (02) :156-162
[10]   Whole chromosome loss and genomic instability in mouse embryos after CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing [J].
Papathanasiou, Stamatis ;
Markoulaki, Styliani ;
Blaine, Logan J. ;
Leibowitz, Mitchell L. ;
Zhang, Cheng-Zhong ;
Jaenisch, Rudolf ;
Pellman, David .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)