"Uninsurable because of a genetic test": a qualitative study of consumer views about the use of genetic test results in Australian life insurance

被引:3
作者
Muller, Cassandra [1 ]
Gallacher, Lyndon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keogh, Louise [4 ]
McInerney-Leo, Aideen [5 ]
Boughtwood, Tiffany [3 ,6 ]
Gleeson, Penny [7 ]
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine [8 ]
Delatycki, Martin B. [2 ,3 ]
Winship, Ingrid [9 ,10 ]
Nowak, Kristen J. [11 ]
Otlowski, Margaret [12 ,13 ]
Lacaze, Paul [14 ]
Tiller, Jane [3 ,6 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Victorian Clin Genet Serv, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Frazer Inst, Dermatol Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Australian Genom, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Deakin Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Northern Clin Sch, Sydney, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Genom Med & Family Canc Clin, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[11] Western Australia Dept Hlth, Off Populat Hlth Genom, Perth, WA, Australia
[12] Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[13] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[14] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Publ Hlth Genom, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
NONDISCRIMINATION ACT; MUTATION CARRIERS; DISCRIMINATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41431-024-01602-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genetic testing can provide valuable information to mitigate personal disease risk, but the use of genetic results in life insurance underwriting is known to deter many consumers from pursuing genetic testing. In 2019, following Australian Federal Parliamentary Inquiry recommendations, the Financial Services Council (FSC) introduced an industry-led partial moratorium, prohibiting life insurance companies from using genetic test results for policies up to $AUD500,000. We used semi-structured interviews to explore genetic test consumers' experiences and views about the FSC moratorium and the use of genetic results by life insurers. Individuals who participated in an online survey and agreed to be re-contacted to discuss the issue further were invited. Interviews were 20-30-min long, conducted via video conference, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive content analysis. Twenty-seven participants were interviewed. Despite the moratorium, concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance were prevalent. Participants reported instances where life insurers did not consider risk mitigation when assessing risk for policies based on genetic results, contrary to legal requirements. Most participants felt that the moratorium provided inadequate protection against discrimination, and that government legislation regulating life insurers' use of genetic results is necessary. Many participants perceived the financial limits to be inadequate, given the cost-of-living in Australia. Our findings indicate that from the perspective of participants, the moratorium has not been effective in allaying fears about genetic discrimination or ensuring adequate access to life insurance products. Concern about genetic discrimination in life insurance remains prevalent in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 836
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act [J].
Allain, Dawn C. ;
Friedman, Sue ;
Senter, Leigha .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2012, 11 (04) :637-644
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, LENDING INDICATORS A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNI
[4]  
Australian Government the Treasury, 2023, RELEASE CONSULTATION
[5]  
Australian Government The Treasury, 2023, CONSULTATION USE GEN
[6]   Verification of consumers' experiences and perceptions of genetic discrimination and its impact on utilization of genetic testing [J].
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine ;
Taylor, Sandra D. ;
Treloar, Susan A. ;
Stranger, Mark ;
Otlowski, Margaret .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (03) :193-201
[7]   The Genetic Non-Discrimination Act: critical for promoting health and science in Canada [J].
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Heim-Myers, Bev .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (19) :E579-E580
[8]   Attitudes of Costa Rican individuals towards donation of personal genetic data for research [J].
Chavarria-Soley, Gabriela ;
Francis-Cartin, Fernanda ;
Jimenez-Gonzalez, Fabiola ;
Avila-Aguirre, Alejandro ;
Castro-Gomez, Maria Jose ;
Robarts, Lauren ;
Middleton, Anna ;
Raventos, Henriette .
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (02) :141-152
[9]  
Commonwealth of Australia, 2018, PARLIAMENTARY JOINT
[10]   Association of Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Cancer Risk and Mortality [J].
Domchek, Susan M. ;
Friebel, Tara M. ;
Singer, Christian F. ;
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Lynch, Henry T. ;
Isaacs, Claudine ;
Garber, Judy E. ;
Neuhausen, Susan L. ;
Matloff, Ellen ;
Eeles, Rosalind ;
Pichert, Gabriella ;
Van T'veer, Laura ;
Tung, Nadine ;
Weitzel, Jeffrey N. ;
Couch, Fergus J. ;
Rubinstein, Wendy S. ;
Ganz, Patricia A. ;
Daly, Mary B. ;
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. ;
Tomlinson, Gail ;
Schildkraut, Joellen ;
Blum, Joanne L. ;
Rebbeck, Timothy R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (09) :967-975