Material flows and GHG emissions from housing stock evolution in US counties, 2020-60

被引:31
作者
Berrill, Peter [1 ]
Hertwich, Edgar G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Ctr Ind Ecol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Trondheim, Norway
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
building stock; construction demand; floor area; embodied GHG emissions; housing; material flow; resource efficiency; vacancy; US; ENERGY DEMAND; VACANCY; SCENARIO; MARKET;
D O I
10.5334/bc.126
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The evolution of housing stocks determines demand for construction materials and energy, and associated emissions of greenhouse gasses (GHGs). The contribution of construction to building life-cycle emissions is growing as buildings become more energy efficient and the energy supply decarbonizes. A housing stock model is developed for counties in the United States using dynamic vacancy rates which endogenously influence stock out- and inflows. Stocks of three house types and 10 construction cohorts are projected for all contiguous US counties for the period 2020-60. Inflows and outflows of construction materials are then estimated along with GHG emissions associated with material production and construction activities in scenarios defined by stock turnover rates, population share by house type, and floor area characteristics of new houses. The results provide new insights into the drivers of construction-related emissions at local and national levels, and identify opportunities for their reduction. Demolition material flows grow in relation to construction material flows over the analysis period. Increasing the stock turnover rate increases future floor area per person, material requirements, and emissions from construction. Scenarios with reduced floor area and more multifamily homes in new construction have lower floor area growth, material requirements, and emissions from construction.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 617
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components [J].
Andersen, Camilla Ernst ;
Kanafani, Kai ;
Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ;
Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard ;
Birgisdottir, Harpa .
BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01) :379-392
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SURVEY CONSTRUCTION
[3]  
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2020, Athena Impact Estimator for Buildings Software
[4]   Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review [J].
Augiseau, Vincent ;
Barles, Sabine .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 123 :153-164
[5]   Linking Housing Policy, Housing Typology, and Residential Energy Demand in the United States [J].
Berrill, Peter ;
Gillingham, Kenneth T. ;
Hertwich, Edgar G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) :2224-2233
[6]  
Bliss L., 2021, Bloomberg City LabMarch 1
[7]  
Carlyle E., 2016, Construction Dive
[8]   New Conceptions of Sufficient Home Size in High-Income Countries: Are We Approaching a Sustainable Consumption Transition? [J].
Cohen, Maurie J. .
HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY, 2021, 38 (02) :173-203
[9]   Modelling global material stocks and flows for residential and service sector buildings towards 2050 [J].
Deetman, Sebastiaan ;
Marinova, Sylvia ;
van der Voet, Ester ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
Edelenbosch, Oreane ;
Heijungs, Reinout .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 245
[10]   Housing stock shrinkage: vacancy and demolition trends in Germany [J].
Deilmann, Clemens ;
Effenberger, Karl-Heinz ;
Banse, Juliane .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2009, 37 (5-6) :660-668