Eliciting Older Cancer Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up Care to Inform a Primary Healthcare Follow-Up Model in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:2
作者
Geng, Jiawei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ran [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Xinyu [4 ]
Xu, Rongfang [5 ]
Liu, Jibin [2 ]
Jiang, Haiyan [6 ]
Wang, Gaoren [2 ]
Hesketh, Therese [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Ctr Global Hlth, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Inst Oncol, Nantong, Peoples R China
[3] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
[4] Nantong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Nantong, Peoples R China
[5] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Nursing, Nantong, Peoples R China
[6] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Hlth Management, Nantong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SURVIVORS; BREAST; PHYSICIANS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00697-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives Increasing longevity and advances in treatment have increased the cancer burden in the elderly, resulting in complex follow-up care needs; however, in China, little is known about the follow-up care preferences of these patients. This study quantified older cancer patients' preferences for follow-up care and examined the trade-offs they are willing to make to accept an alternative follow-up model.Methods A discrete choice experiment was conducted among inpatients aged over 60 years with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, at two large tertiary hospitals in Nantong, China. Preference weights for follow-up care were estimated using mixed logit analysis. Subgroup analysis and latent class analysis were used to explore preference heterogeneity.Results Complete results were obtained from 422 patients (144 with breast cancer, 133 with prostate cancer, 145 with colorectal cancer), with a mean age of 70.81 years. Older cancer patients stated a preference for follow-up by specialists over primary healthcare (PHC) providers ( beta \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta$$\end{document} = -1.18, 95% confidence interval -1.40 to -0.97). The provider of follow-up care services was the most valued attribute among patients with breast cancer (relative importance [RI] 37.17%), while remote contact services were prioritized by patients with prostate (RI 43.50%) and colorectal cancer (RI 33.01%). The uptake rate of an alternative care model integrating PHC increased compared with the baseline setting when patients were provided with preferred services (continuity of care, individualized care plans, and remote contact services).Conclusion To encourage older cancer patients to use PHC-integrated follow-up care, alternative follow-up care models need to be based on patients' preferences before introducing them as a routine option.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 601
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Alfano Catherine M, 2019, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, V39, P625, DOI 10.1200/EDBK_238267
  • [2] Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society-American Society of Clinical Oncology summit
    Alfano, Catherine M.
    Mayer, Deborah K.
    Bhatia, Smita
    Maher, Jane
    Scott, Jessica M.
    Nekhlyudov, Larissa
    Merrill, Janette K.
    Henderson, Tara O.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2019, 69 (03) : 234 - 247
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, How to Conduct a Discrete Choice Experiment for Health Workforce Recruitment and Retention in Remote and Rural Areas: A User Guide with Case Studies
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, CIRC ISS OP ACC DEV
  • [5] Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aubin, Michele
    Vezina, Lucie
    Verreault, Rene
    Simard, Sebastien
    Hudon, Eveline
    Desbiens, Jean-Francois
    Fillion, Lise
    Dumont, Serge
    Tourigny, Andre
    Daneault, Serge
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [6] What sort of follow-up services would Australian breast cancer survivors prefer if we could no longer offer long-term specialist-based care? A discrete choice experiment
    Bessen, T.
    Chen, G.
    Street, J.
    Eliott, J.
    Karnon, J.
    Keefe, D.
    Ratcliffe, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (04) : 859 - 867
  • [7] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [8] Does A Medical Consortium Influence Health Outcomes of Hospitalized Cancer Patients? An Integrated Care Model in Shanxi, China
    Cai, Miao
    Liu, Echu
    Tao, Hongbing
    Qian, Zhengmin
    Fu, Qiang
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Wang, Manli
    Xu, Chang
    Ni, Ziling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18 (02):
  • [9] Effectiveness and implementation of models of cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews
    Chan, Raymond J.
    Crawford-Williams, Fiona
    Crichton, Megan
    Joseph, Ria
    Hart, Nicolas H.
    Milley, Kristi
    Druce, Paige
    Zhang, Jianrong
    Jefford, Michael
    Lisy, Karolina
    Emery, Jon
    Nekhlyudov, Larissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2023, 17 (01) : 197 - 221
  • [10] Current Status of Out-of-Hospital Management of Cancer Patients and Awareness of Internet Medical Treatment: A Questionnaire Survey
    Dai, Shuang
    Liu, Xiaoqin
    Chen, Xi
    Bie, Jun
    Du, Chi
    Miao, Jidong
    Jiang, Ming
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9