Deep Learning in Predicting Preterm Birth: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:0
作者
Zhang Fangchao [1 ]
Tong Lingling [2 ]
Shi Chen [3 ]
Zuo Rui [4 ]
Wang Liwei [3 ]
Wang Yan [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
[2] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China
[3] School of Intelligence Science and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
[4] Information Management and Big Data Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
[5] National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
[6] National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Preterm birth; Transformer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP181 [自动推理、机器学习]; R714.21 [流产、早产及过期妊娠];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ; 100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether deep learning algorithms are suitable for predicting preterm birth.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023. Birth data were divided into two parts based on the date of delivery: the first part was used for model training and validation, while real world viability was evaluated using the second part. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and transformer) were employed to predict preterm birth. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated.Results: This research included data on 30,965 births, where 24,770 comprised the first part, and included 3164 (12.77%) in the preterm birth group, with 6195 in the second part, including 795 (12.83%) in the preterm birth group. Significant differences in various factors were observed between the preterm and full-term birth groups. The transformer model (AUC = 79.20%, sensitivity = 73.67%, specificity = 72.48%, PPV = 28.21%, NPV = 94.95%, and accuracy = 72.61 % in the test dataset) demonstrated superior performance relative to logistic regression (AUC = 77.96% in the test dataset), support vector machine (AUC = 71.70% in the test dataset), and random forest (AUC = 75.09% in the test dataset) approaches.Conclusion: This study highlights the promise of deep learning algorithms, specifically the transformer algorithm, for predicting preterm birth.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Comparative study of machine learning algorithms in predicting asphaltene precipitation with a novel validation technique [J].
Jafar Khalighi ;
Alexey Cheremisin .
Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 :3097-3111
[32]   Predicting Multiclass Java']Java Code Readability: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms [J].
Susanto, Budi ;
Ferdiana, Ridi ;
Adji, Teguh Bharata .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 16 (04) :1055-1064
[33]   Predicting Stock Market Trends Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms Via Continuous and Binary Data; a Comparative Analysis [J].
Nabipour, Mojtaba ;
Nayyeri, Pooyan ;
Jabani, Hamed ;
Shahab, S. ;
Mosavi, Amir .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :150199-150212
[34]   Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection System Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms [J].
Note J. ;
Ali M. .
Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing, 2022, 6 (03) :19-36
[35]   A comparative evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for question categorization of VQA datasets [J].
Asudani, Deepak Suresh ;
Nagwani, Naresh Kumar ;
Singh, Pradeep .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (19) :57829-57859
[36]   Parkinson's Disease Classification through Gait Analysis: Comparative study of deep learning and machine learning algorithms [J].
Al-Hammadi, Mustafa ;
Fazlali, Masoumeh ;
Fleyeh, Hasan .
2024 IEEE 19TH CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, ICIEA 2024, 2024,
[37]   Unveiling the power of features: A comparative study of machine learning and deep learning for modulation recognition [J].
Leblebici, Merih ;
Çalhan, Ali ;
Cicioğlu, Murtaza .
Physical Communication, 2025, 72
[38]   A Comparative Study on Machine Learning algorithms for Knowledge Discovery [J].
Suseela, Siddesh Sambasivam ;
Feng, Yang ;
Mao, Kezhi .
2022 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND VISION (ICARCV), 2022, :131-136
[39]   A comparative study of Machine learning algorithms for VANET networks [J].
Ftaimi, Sara ;
Mazri, Tomader .
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, INFORMATION SYSTEM & SECURITY (NISS'20), 2020,
[40]   Predicting preterm birth through vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and WBC using a machine learning model [J].
Park, Sunwha ;
Moon, Jeongsup ;
Kang, Nayeon ;
Kim, Young-Han ;
You, Young-Ah ;
Kwon, Eunjin ;
Ansari, AbuZar ;
Hur, Young Min ;
Park, Taesung ;
Kim, Young Ju .
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13