Are current Chinese national ambient air quality standards on 24-hour averages for particulate matter sufficient to protect public health?

被引:1
|
作者
Rongshan Wu [1 ,2 ]
Xiaoming Song [1 ,2 ]
Yingchen Bai [3 ]
Jie Chen [1 ,2 ]
Qian Zhao [1 ,2 ]
Shuo Liu [1 ,2 ]
Hongbing Xu [1 ,2 ]
Tong Wang [1 ,2 ]
Baihuan Feng [1 ,2 ]
Yi Zhang [1 ,2 ]
Liuju Zhong [4 ]
Xuemei Wang [5 ]
Fengchang Wu [3 ]
Wei Huang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Peking University School of Public Health
[2] Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences of Ministry of Education, Peking University
[3] State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
[4] Guangdong Polytechnic of Environmental Protection Engineering
[5] Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Particulate matter; Mortality; Meta-analysis; Air quality standard; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X51 [大气污染及其防治];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070602 ;
摘要
With rapid economic development and urbanization in recent decades, China has experienced the worsening of ambient air quality. For better air quality management to protect human health, Chinese government revised national ambient air quality standards(NAAQS) for particulate matter(PM) in 2012(GB3095-2012). To assess the effectiveness of current NAAQS for PM on public health in Chinese population, we conducted a metaanalysis on published studies examining the mortality risk of short-term exposure to PM with aerodynamic diameters less than 10 and 2.5 μm(PM10and PM2.5) in China. The reported24-hour concentrations of PM10and PM2.5in studies ranged from 43.5 to 150.1 μg/m3and 37.5 to 176.7 μg/m3. In the pooled excess, mortality risk estimates of short-term exposure to PM.In specific, per 10 μg/m3increase in PM10, we observed increases of 0.40%(95%CI: 0.33%,0.47%), 0.57%(95%CI: 0.44%, 0.70%) and 0.49%(95%CI: 0.40%, 0.58%) in total, respiratory and cardiovascular mortality, per 10 μg/m3increase in PM2.5, we observed increases of 0.51%(95%CI: 0.38%, 0.63%), 0.62%(95%CI: 0.52%, 0.73%) and 0.75%(95%CI: 0.54%, 0.95%) in total,respiratory and cardiovascular mortality. Finally, we derived 125 μg/m3for PM10and 62.5 μg/m3for PM2.5as 24-hour recommendation values based on the pooled estimates. Our results indicated that current Chinese NAAQS for PM could be sufficient in mitigating the excess mortality risk from short-term exposure to ambient PM. However, future research on longterm exposure cohort studies in Chinese population is also essential in revising annual averages for PM in Chinese NAAQS.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Are current Chinese national ambient air quality standards on 24-hour averages for particulate matter sufficient to protect public health?
    Wu, Rongshan
    Song, Xiaoming
    Bai, Yingchen
    Chen, Jie
    Zhao, Qian
    Liu, Shuo
    Xu, Hongbing
    Wang, Tong
    Feng, Baihuan
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhong, Liuju
    Wang, Xuemei
    Wu, Fengchang
    Huang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 71 : 67 - 75
  • [2] Fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality standards: Public health impact on populations in the northeastern United States
    Johnson, PRS
    Graham, JJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (09) : 1140 - 1147
  • [3] Setting ambient air quality standards for particulate matter
    McClellan, RO
    TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 181 : 329 - 347
  • [4] Exceedances of national air quality standards for particulate matter in Western Australia: sources and health-related impacts
    Borchers Arriagada, Nicolas
    Palmer, Andrew J.
    Bowman, David M. J. S.
    Johnston, Fay H.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2020,
  • [5] Does attainment status for the PM10 National Air Ambient Quality Standard change the trend in ambient levels of particulate matter?
    Rava, Marta
    White, Ronald H.
    Dominici, Francesca
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2011, 4 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [6] Does attainment status for the PM10 National Air Ambient Quality Standard change the trend in ambient levels of particulate matter?
    Marta Rava
    Ronald H. White
    Francesca Dominici
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2011, 4 : 133 - 143
  • [7] Comparing the lung cancer burden of ambient particulate matter using scenarios of air quality standards versus acceptable risk levels
    Castro, Alberto
    Goetschi, Thomas
    Achermann, Beat
    Baltensperger, Urs
    Buchmann, Brigitte
    Dietrich, Denise Felber
    Flueckiger, Alexandre
    Geiser, Marianne
    Purghart, Brigitte Gaelli
    Gygax, Hans
    Joss, Meltem Kutlar
    Luethi, Lara Milena
    Probst-Hensch, Nicole
    Straehl, Peter
    Kuenzli, Nino
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 65 (02) : 139 - 148
  • [8] Global review of national ambient air quality standards for PM10 and SO2 (24 h)
    Vahlsing, Candace
    Smith, Kirk R.
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2012, 5 (04) : 393 - 399
  • [9] Global review of national ambient air quality standards for PM10 and SO2 (24 h)
    Candace Vahlsing
    Kirk R. Smith
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2012, 5 : 393 - 399
  • [10] A comprehensive review of vertical profiling of ambient air quality-particulate matter and its impacts on climatic & environmental health
    Nyayapathi, Priyanka Priyadarshini
    Namuduri, Srinivas
    Kolli, Suresh Kumar
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2025,