QUANTITATIVE FACTORS IN CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS - VARIATION IN CARCINOGENIC POTENCY

被引:28
|
作者
KREWSKI, D
SZYSZKOWICZ, M
ROSENKRANZ, H
机构
[1] CARLETON UNIV,DEPT MATH & STAT,OTTAWA K1S 5B6,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT ENVIRONM HLTH SCI,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0273-2300(05)80043-1
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The quantitative assessment of toxicological data on the carcinogenic potential of chemicals requires consideration of a number of factors, including mathematical models of the mechanism of carcinogenic action and pharmacokinetic models for the metabolic activation of the parent compound to its reactive metabolite. In this article, the use of such models in estimating carcinogenic potency and in predicting risks at low levels of exposure is discussed, along with other factors involved in the evaluation of carcinogen bioassay data. The Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB) established by Gold et al. (1984, Environ. Health Perspect. 58, 9-322) is used to illustrate the application of quantitative approaches to carcinogenic risk assessment and to examine the variation in the potency of chemical carcinogens. Based on an analysis of 585 experiments selected from the CPDB, the risk-specific (10-6) doses (RSDs) obtained by linear extrapolation from the TD50 were generally within a factor of 5-10 of those derived from the linearized multistage model. The RSDs obtained by linear extrapolation from the TD50 are roughly lognormally distributed with a median of about 20-90 ng/kg/day, depending on the subset of the CPDB considered. This distribution has been used by Rulis (1986, in Food Protection Technology (C. W. Felix, Ed.), pp. 29-37, Lewis, Chelsea, MI) to explore the concept of a threshold of regulation for chemical carcinogens present in the environment at low levels. © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 29
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INTERSPECIES COMPARISON OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY
    CROUCH, E
    WILSON, R
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1979, 5 (06): : 1095 - 1118
  • [22] THE CARCINOGENIC POTENCY OF CERTAIN OILS
    BINGHAM, E
    HORTON, AW
    TYE, R
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1965, 10 (03): : 449 - 451
  • [23] Quantum Chemical Metabolism-Based Simulation of Carcinogenic Potency of Benzene Derivatives
    D'Yachkov, Pavel N.
    Kharchevnikova, Nina V.
    Zholdakova, Zoya I.
    Fjodorova, Nathalia
    Novich, Mariana
    Vrachko, Marian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2010, 110 (07) : 1402 - 1411
  • [24] QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS IN-VITRO
    DIPAOLO, JA
    IN VITRO-JOURNAL OF THE TISSUE CULTURE ASSOCIATION, 1972, 7 (04): : 262 - &
  • [25] RANKING OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY USING A RELATIVE POTENCY APPROACH
    GLASS, LR
    EASTERLY, CE
    JONES, TD
    WALSH, PJ
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 21 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [26] QUANTITATIVE ALTERATIONS IN DESMOSOMES DURING CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS
    WHITE, FH
    GOHARI, K
    MAYHEW, TM
    JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1980, 131 (DEC) : 775 - 776
  • [27] QUANTITATIVE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CARCINOGENIC POTENCY IN LONG-TERM TESTS AND POTENCY IN SOME SHORT-TERM TESTS
    PARODI, S
    TANINGHER, M
    SANTI, L
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1983, 24 (MAR): : 69 - 69
  • [28] ANALYSIS OF MODIFYING FACTORS IN CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS
    COHEN, SM
    PROGRESS IN EXPERIMENTAL TUMOR RESEARCH, 1991, 33 : 21 - 40
  • [29] Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency
    Wang, Nina Ching Yi
    Venkatapathy, Raghuraman
    Bruce, Robert Mark
    Moudgal, Chandrika
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 59 (02) : 215 - 226
  • [30] Chemical and biological factors affecting mutagen potency
    Colvin, ME
    Hatch, FT
    Felton, JS
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 400 (1-2) : 479 - 492