ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE IN THE CRITICALLY ILL - MANAGEMENT BY CONTINUOUS VENOVENOUS HEMODIAFILTRATION

被引:12
作者
BELLOMO, R [1 ]
PARKIN, G [1 ]
BOYCE, N [1 ]
机构
[1] MONASH MED CTR,DEPT MED,LOCKED BAG 29,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0883-9441(93)90019-H
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The consequences of newer techniques of continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients are not yet fully known. The clinical and biochemical impact of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHD) was, therefore, prospectively studied in 60 critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Prospective clinical, biochemical, and hematological data were collected from patients receiving CVVHD. Over the initial 24 hours of therapy, CVVHD resulted in a decrease in mean plasma urea from 34.5 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.4 to 39.6) to 25 mmol/L (95% CI, 21.8 to 28.2). With continued CVVHD, the mean plasma urea reached a plateau level of 17.6 mmol/L (95% CI, 15.8 to 19.4) at 72 hours. This degree of azotemia control was achieved with ease and essentially without complications during 8,360 hours of therapy despite the presence of multi-organ failure and the aggressive administration of protein nitrogen (0.25 to 0.35 g/kg/day). No abnormalities of serum electrolytes developed during treatment. Survival to intensive care discharge was 46.6% and to hospital discharge 41.6%, despite a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Il score at presentation of 27.7. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration offers superior azotemia control and a safe approach to renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. Its use is associated with a comparatively favorable outcome. CVVHD may be regarded as the treatment of choice in such patients. © 1993.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 144
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Kierdorf, Continuous versus intermittent treatment: clinical results in acute renal failure, Contrib Nephrol, 93, pp. 1-12, (1991)
[2]  
Golper, Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in acute renal failure, Am J Kidney Dis, 6, pp. 373-386, (1985)
[3]  
Stevens, Riley, Davies, Et al., Continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis in critically ill patients, Lancet, 2, pp. 150-152, (1988)
[4]  
Wendon, Smithies, Sheppard, Et al., Continuous high volume veno-venous hemofiltration in acute renal failure, Intensive Care Med, 15, pp. 358-363, (1989)
[5]  
Nays, Draper, Wagner, Et al., APACHE II a severity of disease classification system, Critical Care Medicine, 13, pp. 818-827, (1985)
[6]  
Jordan, Miller, Kubos, Rogers, Evaluation of sepsis in a critically ill surgical population, Crit Care Med, 15, pp. 897-904, (1987)
[7]  
Tran, Groeneveld, van der Meuler, Et al., Age, chronic disease, sepsis, organ system failure, and mortality in a medical intensive care unit, Crit Care Med, 18, pp. 474-479, (1990)
[8]  
Bellomo, Ernest, Love, Et al., Continuous arteriovenous haemodiafiltration: optimal therapy for acute renal failure in an intensive care setting?, Aust N Z J Med, 20, pp. 237-242, (1990)
[9]  
Kaplan, Longneoker, Folkert, Suction assisted continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration, Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs, 29, pp. 408-412, (1983)
[10]  
Kaplan, The effect of predilution during continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration, Am Soc Nephrol, 17, (1984)