CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE MULTICULTURAL ANGER EXPRESSION AND HOSTILITY INVENTORY

被引:1
作者
Moscoso, Manolete S. [1 ]
Merino-Soto, Cesar [1 ]
Dominguez-Lara, Sergio [1 ]
Chau, Cecilia B. [2 ]
Claux, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Martin de Porres, Chiclayo, Peru
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Lima, Peru
来源
LIBERABIT-REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA | 2016年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Anger; hostility; construct validity; factor analysis; internal consistency;
D O I
10.24265/liberabit.2016.v22n2.02
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The main purpose of this study was to verify the factorial structure of the two scales that make up the Multicultural Inventory of Expression of Anger and Hostility from a confirmatory perspective. We performed the Confirmatory Factor Analysis with a non-probability sample of 264 participants from a private university in Lima, Peru. The sampling included university students (25%), faculty members (17.8%) and administrative staff (57.2%). The reliability of the instrument was evaluated using the congeneric, tau-equivalent and parallel models for each of the six subscales of the instrument, as well as calculated based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient with confidence intervals. Results: Factor analysis performed in the present Peruvian sample identified four dimensions for the Anger Expression Scale (Anger-In, Anger-Out, Anger/Control In, and Anger/Control-Out) and two factors for the Hostility Scale (impulsive reaction to anger; and temperament), which substantially verified the factor structure of previous studies conducted in Latin American samples. The congeneric model indicates an appropriate fit for each of the subscales of anger and hostility. Based on the results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis performed in the present study, the factorial structure of both scales of the Multicultural Anger Expression and Hostility Inventory is robust and shows substantial empirical evidence of construction validity and internal consistency of the instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 152
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Alcazar R. J., 2011, INT J PSYCHOL PSYCHO, V11, P307
[2]   On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Herzberg, PY .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (02) :186-203
[3]  
Bentler P. M., 2012, EQS 6 2 WINDOWS PROG
[4]  
Brown TA, 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[5]  
Bryant B. F., 1995, READING UNDERSTANDIN, P99
[6]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[7]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[8]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[9]  
Dominguez S., 2012, REV INMVESTIGACION P, V15, P213, DOI [10.15381/rinvp.v15i1.3684, DOI 10.15381/RINVP.V15I1.3684]
[10]  
DOMINGUEZ S, 2014, REV ARGENTINA CIENCI, V6, P39