CHANGES IN SURGICAL STRATEGIES FOR PEPTIC-ULCERS BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS AND ENDOSCOPIC HEMOSTASIS

被引:19
作者
ISHIKAWA, M
OGATA, S
HARADA, M
SAKAKIHARA, Y
机构
[1] The Department of Surgery, Ehime General Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, 790
来源
SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 1995年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
PEPTIC ULCER; SURGICAL THERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ENDOSCOPIC HEMOSTASIS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00311253
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
A total of 902 surgical patients with peptic ulcer disease were evaluated to clarify the effects of H-2-receptor antagonists and endoscopic hemostasis on surgical treatment. Following the introduction of these treatments to our institute in 1982, the number of operations performed annually decreased by 40%, or 36 cases per year. However, a remarkable increase in the frequency of surgical emergency intervention since 1982 was concurrently observed, with the ratio of emergency procedures to the total number of operated cases increasing to 72.5% in the last 5 years of the study. Moreover, intractability as an indication for surgery decreased to 34.1%, compared with an increase in the number of patients with bleeding and perforated ulcers requiring operation. There were 13 postoperative deaths recorded (1.4%). All of the deaths were in patients who had undergone emergency surgery in poor health. Of these 13 patients, 10 had bleeding ulcers. A study of bleeding ulcers for which endoscopic hemostasis had been unsuccessful revealed that shock on admission and a concomitant medical condition had been evident in all the patients who died, and in 52.2% and 30.4% of the survivors, respectively. The current study suggests that the frequency of high-risk patients requiring surgery is increasing since the introduction of H-2-receptor antagonists and endoscopic hemostasis, and thus, prompt surgical treatment and intensive management for such patients is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 323
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Sachdeva A.K., Zaren H.A., Sigel B., Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease, Med Clin North Am, 75, pp. 999-1012, (1991)
[2]  
Fineberg H.V., Pearlman L.A., Surgical treatment of ulcer in the United States. Trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine, Lancet, 1, pp. 1305-1307, (1981)
[3]  
Bublick M.P., Control of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage with cimetidine, Surgery, 84, pp. 510-515, (1984)
[4]  
Donahue P.E., Mobarhan S., Layden T.J., Nyhus L.M., Endoscopic control of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage with a bipolar coagulation device, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 159, pp. 113-118, (1984)
[5]  
Christensen A., Bousfield R., Christiansen J., Incidence of perforated and bleeding peptic ulcers before and after the introduction of H<sub>2</sub>-receptor antagonists, Ann Surg, 207, pp. 4-6, (1988)
[6]  
Moritomo H., Nagahata Y., Urakawa T., Takeda K., Hashimoto Y., Ichihara T., Saitoh Y., A study of bleeding peptic ulcer in the elderly in the view of risk factors, Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc), 91, pp. 206-213, (1990)
[7]  
Earnest D.L., Maintenance therapy in peptic ulcer disease, Med Clin North Am, 75, pp. 1013-1038, (1991)
[8]  
Sontag S., Current status of maintenance therapy in peptic ulcer disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 83, pp. 607-617, (1988)
[9]  
Wyllie J.H., Clark C.G., Willia J.A., Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer, Lancet, 1, pp. 1307-1308, (1981)
[10]  
McEntee G., Ryan W., Peel A.L.G., Rosenberg I.L., Devlin H.B., A district general hospital experience of surgical treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer from 1970 to 1982, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 167, pp. 53-60, (1988)