INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT AND THE CODES OF ETHICS IN ADMINISTRATION

被引:0
|
作者
Strahovnik, Vojko [1 ]
Skarja, Gasper [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Govt & European Studies, Kranj, Slovenia
来源
CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | 2015年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
professional ethics; ethics in public administration; integrity; code of ethics; ethics legislation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The ethics of public administration can be understood as a field that refers to well-founded criteria of right and wrong conduct, which directs public servants on how to act within the framework of duties of the public administration service, professional and ethical principles, personal virtues, and well-being of the community as a whole. It develops and provides an understanding of public servants' responsibilities, of the main postulates of the criteria and guidelines for public administration as a whole or for specific fields within it, and directs our attention to various factors and pressures present in the administrative environment, which may affect (un)ethical conduct. The main objective of the paper is to define more precisely the ethics of public administration and relate it to the field of ethics in general, and to explore the relationship between integrity and ethics legislation. At the beginning, the thesis that the individual professional ethics should not deviate too much from the very core of ethics is defended. The paper then focuses on the problem of ethics legislation in the field of public administration and identifies its strengths and weaknesses, with specific reference to ethical legislation in the Republic of Slovenia. The very idea of ethics and integrity management of an organization implies a certain level of control. It also implies a planned process, which must be managed with the attentive, precise, and systematic considerations of all the essential postulates of administrative organization, its limitations, mission, and goals. At the end, the paper deals with the concept of integrity and argues that it is most appropriately understood as a metavirtue that connects moral and epistemic aspects of public administration ethics and as a regulatory virtue, which is a vital part of the ethical infrastructure and an essential basis for the effectiveness of ethics legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 920
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sport Integrity: Ethics, Policy and Practice: An Introduction
    Harvey, Andy
    McNamee, Mike
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 4 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [32] Is the Virtue of Integrity Redundant in Aristotelian Virtue Ethics?
    Kristjansson, Kristjan
    APEIRON-A JOURNAL FOR ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE, 2019, 52 (01): : 93 - 115
  • [33] Is it Possible a Definition of Integrity in the Business Ethics Field?.
    Bosch, Magdalena
    Cavallotti, Rita
    REVISTA EMPRESA Y HUMANISMO, 2016, 19 (02) : 51 - 67
  • [34] The Cut and Paste Society: Isomorphism in Codes of Ethics
    Holder-Webb, Lori
    Cohen, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 107 (04) : 485 - 509
  • [35] Ethics codes and professionals' tolerance of societal diversity
    Valentine, S
    Fleischman, G
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2002, 40 (04) : 301 - 312
  • [36] Utilizing codes of ethics in health professions education
    Michael D. Dahnke
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2014, 19 : 611 - 623
  • [37] The Cut and Paste Society: Isomorphism in Codes of Ethics
    Lori Holder-Webb
    Jeffrey Cohen
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 107 : 485 - 509
  • [38] The Ethical Consumer and Codes of Ethics in the Fashion Industry
    Cerchia, Rossella Esther
    Piccolo, Katherine
    LAWS, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [39] Living up to your codes? Corporate codes of ethics and the cost of equity capital
    Duong, Hong Kim
    Fasan, Marco
    Gotti, Giorgio
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2022, 60 (13) : 1 - 24
  • [40] Ethics Codes and Professionals' Tolerance of Societal Diversity
    Sean Valentine
    Gary Fleischman
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2002, 40 : 301 - 312