Bayesian models for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis

被引:46
作者
Zhang, Linlin [1 ]
Guindani, Michele [2 ]
Vannucci, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Stat, Houston, TX 77251 USA
[2] UT MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
来源
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS | 2015年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
Bayesian statistics; brain connectivity; classification and prediction; fMRI; spatiotemporal activation models;
D O I
10.1002/wics.1339
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a noninvasive neuroimaging method that provides an indirect measure of neuronal activity by detecting blood flow changes, has experienced an explosive growth in the past years. Statistical methods play a crucial role in understanding and analyzing fMRI data. Bayesian approaches, in particular, have shown great promise in applications. A remarkable feature of fully Bayesian approaches is that they allow a flexible modeling of spatial and temporal correlations in the data. This article provides a review of the most relevant models developed in recent years. We divide methods according to the objective of the analysis. We start from spatiotemporal models for fMRI data that detect task-related activation patterns. We then address the very important problem of estimating brain connectivity. We also touch upon methods that focus on making predictions of an individual's brain activity or a clinical or behavioral response. We conclude with a discussion of recent integrative models that aim at combining fMRI data with other imaging modalities, such as electroencephalography/ magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data, measured on the same subjects. We also briefly discuss the emerging field of imaging genetics. (C) 2014Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 41
页数:21
相关论文
共 141 条
  • [31] Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Theory
    Friston, KJ
    Penny, W
    Phillips, C
    Kiebel, S
    Hinton, G
    Ashburner, J
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) : 465 - 483
  • [32] Posterior probability maps and SPMs
    Friston, KJ
    Penny, W
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (03) : 1240 - 1249
  • [33] Dynamic causal modelling
    Friston, KJ
    Harrison, L
    Penny, W
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (04) : 1273 - 1302
  • [34] Event-related fMRI: Characterizing differential responses
    Friston, KJ
    Fletcher, P
    Josephs, O
    Holmes, A
    Rugg, MD
    Turner, R
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 7 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [35] Friston KJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P416
  • [36] Regional cerebral activity associated with the incidental processing of pseudo-words
    Frith, CD
    Kapur, N
    Friston, KJ
    Liddle, PF
    Frackowiak, RSJ
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [37] A Bayesian time-course model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data
    Genovese, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (451) : 691 - 703
  • [38] George EI, 1997, STAT SINICA, V7, P339
  • [39] Genetic control over the resting brain
    Glahn, D. C.
    Winkler, A. M.
    Kochunov, P.
    Almasy, L.
    Duggirala, R.
    Carless, M. A.
    Curran, J. C.
    Olvera, R. L.
    Laird, A. R.
    Smith, S. M.
    Beckmann, C. F.
    Fox, P. T.
    Blangero, J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (03) : 1223 - 1228
  • [40] Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping
    Goebel, R
    Roebroeck, A
    Kim, DS
    Formisano, E
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 21 (10) : 1251 - 1261