Comparison of caudal tramadol versus caudal fentanyl with bupivacaine for prolongation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients

被引:8
作者
Solanki, N. M. [1 ]
Engineer, S. R. [1 ]
Jansari, D. B. [1 ]
Patel, R. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] BJ Med Coll & Civil Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
Bupivacaine; caudal block; fentanyl; postoperative analgesia; tramadol;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.168807
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Caudal block is a common technique for pediatric analgesia for infraumblical surgeries. Because of the short duration of analgesia with bupivacaine alone various additive have been used to prolong the action of bupivacaine. The present study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of tramadol or fentanyl added to bupivacaine for infraumblical surgeries in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial. After written informed consent from parents, 100 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-II, in the age group of 1-12 years, of either sex undergoing infraumblical surgery under general anesthesia were divided into two groups. Group BT received 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with tramadol 2 mg/kg in normal saline and Group BF received 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 mu g/kg in normal saline with maximum volume of 12 ml in both groups. All patients were assessed intraoperatively for hemodynamic changes, the requirement of sevoflurane concentration, as well as postoperatively for pain by using FLACC (F = Face, L = Leg, A = Activity, C = Cry, C = Consolability), pain score and for sedation by using four point sedation score. Results: The mean duration of analgesia was 10-18 h in Group BT while in Group BF it was 7-11 h. The postoperatively period up to 1 1/2 h, Group BF had higher sedation score up to two as compared to that below one on Group BT. Conclusion: Caudal tramadol significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia as compared to caudal fentanyl without any side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PAEDIATRICS PATIENTS THROUGH CAUDAL BLOCK WITH BUPIVACAINE AND TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF FENTANYL - A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Acharya, Ranjita
    Jena, Saubhagya Kumar
    Samal, Soumya
    Mishra, Suvendu Narayan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (39): : 7568 - 7574
  • [2] Ahmad S, 2012, INTERNET J ANESTHESI, V30, P3
  • [3] Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children
    Beyaz, Serblent Gokhan
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 24 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [4] ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE-FENTANYL MIXTURE IN CHILDREN
    CAMPBELL, FA
    YENTIS, SM
    FEAR, DW
    BISSONNETTE, B
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (07): : 661 - 664
  • [5] The use of additives to local anaesthetic solutions for caudal epidural blockade
    Cook, B
    Doyle, E
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 6 (05): : 353 - 359
  • [6] A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children
    Demiraran, Y
    Kocaman, B
    Akman, RY
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (04) : 510 - 513
  • [7] Doctor Tarlika P, 2013, Anesth Essays Res, V7, P212, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.118965
  • [8] El Hamamsy M, 2008, KASR EL EINY MED J, V14, P1
  • [9] Does the addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in caudal epidural block have an effect on the plasma level of catecholamines in children?
    Gaitini, LA
    Somri, M
    Vaida, SJ
    Yanovski, B
    Mogilner, G
    Sabo, E
    Lischinsky, S
    Greenberg, A
    Levy, N
    Zinder, O
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (05) : 1029 - 1033
  • [10] A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of caudal block using ropivacaine 0.2% with or without fentanyl 1 μg kg-1 in children
    Kawaraguchi, Y.
    Otomo, T.
    Ota, C.
    Uchida, N.
    Taniguchi, A.
    Inoue, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (06) : 858 - 861