DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF SEROTONERGIC AND CATECHOLAMINERGIC DRUGS ON INGESTIVE BEHAVIOR

被引:43
作者
ASIN, KE [1 ]
DAVIS, JD [1 ]
BEDNARZ, L [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS, DEPT PSYCHOL, CHICAGO, IL 60680 USA
关键词
ANORECTICS; INGESTION RATE; MICROSTRUCTURE OF INGESTION; FOOD INTAKE; SUGARS; CARBOHYDRATE; AMPHETAMINE; FENFLURAMINE; FLUOXETINE; PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE; SEROTONIN; NOREPINEPHRINE;
D O I
10.1007/BF02247717
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The serotonergic agonists fenfluramine and fluoxetine and the catecholaminergic agonists amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine are well known to cause a reduction in intake in rats. In the studies reported here we investigated the effects of these drugs on the microstructure of licking behavior of the rat ingesting 0.4 M sucrose. The purpose was to examine the similarities in the behavioral effects within and between these two classes of anorectic agents. The serotonergic agonists fenfluramine and fluoxetine caused a reduction in intake primarily by reducing the size of bursts and clusters of licking within the test meal without affecting the duration of the meal, suggesting a reduction in the palatability of the test solution. The catecholamine agonists amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine reduced intake primarily by reducing the number of bursts and clusters without affecting their size, suggesting a fractionation in the organization of the normal pattern of ingestion. The differences between the two serotonin and the two catecholamine agonists on the microstructure of the licking behavior suggest a different effect of the two neurotransmitters on the motor system that controls ingestive behavior. The similarities between the two different agonists within each class suggests a common neurotransmitter mechanism responsible for these two different effects on the behavior of the animals.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 421
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ANTELMAN SM, 1981, ANORECTIC AGENTS MEC, P45
[2]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ANOREXIC ACTIONS OF AMPHETAMINE AND FENFLURAMINE-POSSIBLE EFFECTS ON HUNGER AND SATIETY [J].
BLUNDELL, JE ;
LATHAM, CJ ;
LESHEM, MB .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1976, 28 (06) :471-477
[3]  
BLUNDELL JE, 1987, HDB PSYCHOPHARMACOLO
[4]   THE EFFECT OF FENFLURAMINE ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF FEEDING AND DRINKING IN THE RAT [J].
BURTON, MJ ;
COOPER, SJ ;
POPPLEWELL, DA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 72 (04) :621-633
[5]   DOPAMINERGIC AND SEROTONINERGIC ANORECTICS DIFFERENTIALLY ANTAGONIZE INSULIN-INDUCED AND 2-DG-INDUCED HYPERPHAGIA [J].
CARRUBA, MO ;
RICCIARDI, S ;
SPANO, PF ;
MANTEGAZZA, P .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1985, 36 (18) :1739-1749
[6]   MODEL FOR CONTROL OF INGESTION [J].
DAVIS, JD ;
LEVINE, MW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (04) :379-412
[7]  
DAVIS JD, 1989, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V575, P106
[8]   ANALYSIS OF THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF THE RHYTHMIC TONGUE MOVEMENTS OF RATS INGESTING MALTOSE AND SUCROSE SOLUTIONS [J].
DAVIS, JD ;
SMITH, GP .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 106 (01) :217-228
[9]  
DAVIS JD, 1990, QUICK LICK COMPUTER
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE, D-AMPHETAMINE AND D-NORPSEUDOEPHEDRINE ON OPEN-FIELD LOCOMOTION AND FOOD-INTAKE IN THE RAT [J].
EISENBERG, MS ;
MAHER, TJ ;
SILVERMAN, HI .
APPETITE, 1987, 9 (01) :31-37