The Relationship between Job Training and Job Satisfaction: A Review of Literature

被引:7
作者
Schmidt, Steven W. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Adult Educ, Coll Educ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Job Satisfaction; Job Training; Job Training Satisfaction; Training Outcomes; Workplace Training;
D O I
10.4018/javet.2010040103
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As stand-alone concepts, job satisfaction and job training have each been researched extensively. However, encouraged by researchers who have found a myriad of effects of job training on employee behavior in the workplace, the concepts of job training and job satisfaction are being examined together. Results of many studies indicate that the effects of job training go beyond those that might be considered traditional, that is, the acquisition of knowledge, the improvement of skill, and the increasing of efficiency in the workplace. This review of literature looks at the relationship between job training and job satisfaction, and also examines the concept of job training satisfaction. It has been found that the research on the relationship between these two concepts can be categorized as follows: job training satisfaction as a measured construct, workplace and employee studies, training methodology studies, perception and meaning, and additional outcomes. Training and development practitioners must be aware of the relationship between job training and job satisfaction when planning and promoting workplace training programs.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, THESIS
  • [2] Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers
    Armstrong-Stassen, Marjorie
    Ursel, Nancy D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 82 (01) : 201 - 220
  • [3] Duff J, 1994, 378316 ERIC ED
  • [4] The restructuring of career paths in large service sector organizations: 'delayering', upskilling and polarisation'
    Grimshaw, D
    Beynon, H
    Rubery, J
    Ward, K
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2002, 50 (01) : 89 - 116
  • [5] HATCHER T, 1999, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V10, P365
  • [6] Jalajas DS., 1999, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V10, P329, DOI [10.1002/hrdq.3920100405, DOI 10.1002/HRDQ.3920100405]
  • [7] Jewell L. N., 1985, CONT IND ORG PSYCHOL
  • [8] Kraiger K, 2001, PEOPLE EVALUATE OTHE, P203
  • [9] Landy F.J., 1985, PSYCHOL WORK BEHAV
  • [10] Lowry D.S., 2002, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V13, P53