Customized Acetabular Components in Revision hip Arthroplasty

被引:3
|
作者
Kavalersky, G. M. [1 ]
Murylev, V. Yu. [1 ,2 ]
Rukin, Y. A. [1 ]
Lychagin, A. V. [1 ]
Elizarov, P. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, 8-2 Ul Trubetskaya, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] SP Botkin Moscow City Clin Hosp, 5,2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284, Russia
来源
TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII | 2016年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
3D printing in orthopaedic surgery; customized tri-flange acetabular component; pelvic discontinuity; revision hip arthroplasty;
D O I
10.21823/2311-2905-2016-22-4-114-121
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there is a trend of increasing demand for revision hip arthroplasty. Among these patients there are many with complex acetabular defects, including patients with pelvic discontinuity. To ensure stability for revised acetabular components in such cases becomes a challenging or unachievable task. Such defects give indications for printing customized tri-flange acetabular component. The authors analysed own experience of creating and applying custom made acetabular components in 3 patients with complex acetabular defects. Material and methods. Among the patients there were 2 women and 1 man. Average age was 60,3 +/- 19,4 years (38 to 78 years). Two patients had III B defects with pelvic discontinuity and one patient had III A defect by Paprosky classification. As the first step, the authors in collaboration with engineers printed a plaster full size pelvic 3D model, as the second step a customized tri-flange acetabular component was designed and printed. Harris Hip Score was evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Results. Average follow-up period was 5,3 +/- 2,5 months (3 to 8 months). The authors observed no cases of implant loosening, dislocation or deep periprosthetic infection. Average Harris Hip Score before surgery was 27,13 and after surgery - 74,1 indicating a significant improvement in 3 months postoperatively. Conclusion. Indications for use of individual acetabular components in reported patients correspond to indications formulated by Berasi et al. The authors obtained encouraging early follow-up outcomes that correspond to data of other authors. In one patient certain difficulties were reported due to insufficient pelvic distraction. Component's flanges prevented achieving adequate pelvic distraction. Nevertheless, good primary stability was achieved. Modern software and 3D metal printers can significantly reduce the production cost of customized acetabular components. Application of this technology can be widened to various orthopaedic centres and will undoubtedly improve the quality of treatment for such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative acetabular component position in revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Schwartz, Andrew M.
    Farley, Kevin X.
    Anastasio, Albert T.
    Bradbury, Thomas L.
    Guild, George N., III
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 466 - 474
  • [22] Does An Enhanced Surface Finish Improve Acetabular Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Jamieson, Miranda L.
    Russell, Robert D.
    Incavo, Stephen J.
    Noble, Philip C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (04): : 644 - 648
  • [23] The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Wright, Timothy
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Gu, Alexander
    Bostrom, Mathias
    Haddad, Fares
    Jerabek, Seth
    Bolognesi, Michael
    Fehring, Thomas
    DellaValle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    Jiranek, William
    Walter, William
    Paprosky, Wayne
    Garbuz, Donald
    Sculco, Thomas
    HSS JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01) : 8 - 41
  • [24] Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Initially High Position of the Acetabular Component: What's Special?
    Tikhilov, R. M.
    Dzhavadov, A. A.
    Karpukhin, A. S.
    Vahramyan, A. G.
    Demyanova, K. A.
    Shubnyakov, I. I.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2020, 26 (03): : 9 - 20
  • [25] Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component
    Gladnick, Brian P.
    Fehring, Keith A.
    Odum, Susan M.
    Christie, Michael J.
    DeBoer, David K.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (02): : 500 - 504
  • [26] Acetabular custom implants in the management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
    Zanirato, Andrea
    Quarto, Emanuele
    Coccarello, Francesco
    De Paolis, Matteo
    Spatuzzi, Marco
    Rossi, Gregorio
    Formica, Matteo
    MINERVA ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 75 (01): : 71 - 80
  • [27] A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects
    Colen, Sascha
    Harake, Ramzi
    De Haan, Julien
    Muleir, Michiel
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2013, 79 (01): : 71 - 75
  • [28] Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up
    Takashi Sakai
    Kenji Ohzono
    Takashi Nishii
    Masaki Takao
    Hidenobu Miki
    Nobuo Nakamura
    Nobuhiko Sugano
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 605 - 610
  • [29] Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty
    Kostensalo, I.
    Seppanen, M.
    Virolainen, P.
    Mokka, J.
    Koivisto, M.
    Makela, K. T.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 104 (04) : 267 - 272
  • [30] Management Principles of Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Review of the Literature
    Driesman, Adam S.
    Konopka, Jaclyn A.
    Feder, Oren
    Aggarwal, Vinay
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2023, 81 (01): : 4 - 10