Customized Acetabular Components in Revision hip Arthroplasty

被引:3
|
作者
Kavalersky, G. M. [1 ]
Murylev, V. Yu. [1 ,2 ]
Rukin, Y. A. [1 ]
Lychagin, A. V. [1 ]
Elizarov, P. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, 8-2 Ul Trubetskaya, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] SP Botkin Moscow City Clin Hosp, 5,2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284, Russia
来源
TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII | 2016年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
3D printing in orthopaedic surgery; customized tri-flange acetabular component; pelvic discontinuity; revision hip arthroplasty;
D O I
10.21823/2311-2905-2016-22-4-114-121
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there is a trend of increasing demand for revision hip arthroplasty. Among these patients there are many with complex acetabular defects, including patients with pelvic discontinuity. To ensure stability for revised acetabular components in such cases becomes a challenging or unachievable task. Such defects give indications for printing customized tri-flange acetabular component. The authors analysed own experience of creating and applying custom made acetabular components in 3 patients with complex acetabular defects. Material and methods. Among the patients there were 2 women and 1 man. Average age was 60,3 +/- 19,4 years (38 to 78 years). Two patients had III B defects with pelvic discontinuity and one patient had III A defect by Paprosky classification. As the first step, the authors in collaboration with engineers printed a plaster full size pelvic 3D model, as the second step a customized tri-flange acetabular component was designed and printed. Harris Hip Score was evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Results. Average follow-up period was 5,3 +/- 2,5 months (3 to 8 months). The authors observed no cases of implant loosening, dislocation or deep periprosthetic infection. Average Harris Hip Score before surgery was 27,13 and after surgery - 74,1 indicating a significant improvement in 3 months postoperatively. Conclusion. Indications for use of individual acetabular components in reported patients correspond to indications formulated by Berasi et al. The authors obtained encouraging early follow-up outcomes that correspond to data of other authors. In one patient certain difficulties were reported due to insufficient pelvic distraction. Component's flanges prevented achieving adequate pelvic distraction. Nevertheless, good primary stability was achieved. Modern software and 3D metal printers can significantly reduce the production cost of customized acetabular components. Application of this technology can be widened to various orthopaedic centres and will undoubtedly improve the quality of treatment for such patients.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Custom Flange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Predictors of Failure
    Barlow, Brian T.
    Oi, Kathryn K.
    Lee, Yuo-yu
    Carli, Alberto V.
    Choi, Daniel S.
    Bostrom, Mathias P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (05): : 1057 - 1064
  • [2] The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects
    Mao, Yuanqing
    Xu, Chen
    Xu, Jiawei
    Li, Huiwu
    Liu, Fengxiang
    Yu, Degang
    Zhu, Zhenan
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 2023 - 2030
  • [3] Mid-Term Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Acetabular Augments
    Korytkin, A. A.
    Novikova, Ya S.
    Kovaldov, K. A.
    Korolev, S. B.
    Zykin, A. A.
    Gerasimov, S. A.
    Gerasimov, E. A.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2019, 25 (01): : 9 - 18
  • [4] What Characteristics of the Acetabular Defect Influence the Choice of the Acetabular Component During Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
    Tikhilov, R. M.
    Dzhavadov, A. A.
    Kovalenko, A. N.
    Denisov, A. O.
    Demin, A. S.
    Vahramyan, A. G.
    Shubnyakov, I. I.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2020, 26 (02): : 31 - 49
  • [5] Custom Triflange Acetabular Components for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in the Patients with Severe Acetabular Defects: Planning, Surgical Technique, Outcomes
    Korytkin, A. A.
    Novikova, Ya. S.
    Morozova, E. A.
    Gerasimov, S. A.
    Kovaldov, K. A.
    El Moudni, Yo. M.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2020, 26 (02): : 20 - 30
  • [6] Mechanical Stability of Novel Highly Porous Metal Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    Meyer, Christopher
    Buckley, Christine A.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (03): : 337 - 341
  • [7] Early results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty
    Elganzoury, Ibrahim
    Bassiony, Ayman Abdelaziz
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2013, 79 (05): : 530 - 535
  • [8] Revision hip arthroplasty using a porous tantalum acetabular component
    Miettinen, Hannu J. A.
    Miettinen, Simo S. A.
    Kettunen, Jukka S.
    Jalkanen, Jussi
    Kroger, Heikki
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 31 (06) : 782 - 788
  • [9] Three-Dimensional Models in Planning of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Complex Acetabular Defects
    Kavalerskiy, Gennadiy M.
    Murylev, Valeriy Y.
    Rukin, Yaroslav A.
    Elizarov, Pavel M.
    Lychagin, Alexey V.
    Tselisheva, Evgeniya Y.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 52 (06) : 625 - 630
  • [10] Three-Dimensional Models in Planning of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Complex Acetabular Defects
    Gennadiy M. Kavalerskiy
    Valeriy Y. Murylev
    Yaroslav A. Rukin
    Pavel M. Elizarov
    Alexey V. Lychagin
    Evgeniya Y. Tselisheva
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2018, 52 : 625 - 630