A comparative study of selected multi-criteria decision-making methodologies for location selection of very large concentrated solar power plants in Nigeria

被引:16
|
作者
Ohunakin, Olayinka S. [1 ]
Saracoglu, Burak Omer [2 ]
机构
[1] Covenant Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Energy & Environm Res Grp TEERG, Ota, Nigeria
[2] Tekel Caddesi, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT | 2018年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
Very Large Concentrated Solar Power Plants; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; AHP; CDPC; DEXi; ELECTRE III and IV; Nigeria;
D O I
10.1080/20421338.2018.1495305
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This work studies the location selection of very large concentrated solar power plants (VLCSPPs) in Nigeria using five Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies including: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Consistency-Driven Pairwise Comparisons (CDPC), Decision Expert for Education (DEXi), Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) III and IV. A comparative investigation is performed on only one unique model that is structured in four levels. This model has nine basic factors (Direct Normal Irradiance, grid infrastructure, climatic conditions, water availability conditions, natural disaster/hazard conditions, topographical conditions, geological conditions, land use, allocation and availability, war, terror & security conditions) taken from previous factors selection studies. There are 35 alternatives for the VLCSPP locations in Nigeria for the pre-development investment stage and are presented on Google Earth file (GE). The Super Decisions, JConcluder, DEXi and ELECTRE III-IV software are mainly used in this study. The findings show that the AHP and CDPC rankings are very close to each other. On the other hand, the DEXi, ELECTRE III and IV rankings spread very much amongst the methods. Hence, a small procedural rule is defined for the selection of candidate locations for detailed investigations. Several candidates' VLCSPP locations were found to exist as alternatives, with approximate local central coordinates of 13 degrees 38'55.37 '' N, 13 degrees 20'41.41"E and 13 degrees 6'58.83 '' N, 13 degrees 26'53.63 '' E in Nigeria. These should be further investigated in the following investment stages.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 567
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Location selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods based on objective and subjective weightings
    Mehmet Şahin
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2021, 63 : 1991 - 2021
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP (vol 129, pg 218, 2018)
    Turk, Seda
    Sahin, Gokham
    MEASUREMENT, 2020, 153
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision making on selection of solar-wind hybrid power station location: A case of China
    Wu, Yunna
    Geng, Shuai
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 81 : 527 - 533
  • [24] A multi-criteria performance assessment of concentrated solar power plants for site and technology selection in Egypt
    S. Bayoumi
    N. A. Moharram
    A. I. Shehata
    M. M. Imam
    W. M. El-Maghlany
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21 : 2989 - 3004
  • [25] A multi-criteria performance assessment of concentrated solar power plants for site and technology selection in Egypt
    Bayoumi, S.
    Moharram, N. A.
    Shehata, A. I.
    Imam, M. M.
    El-Maghlany, W. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (03) : 2989 - 3004
  • [26] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [27] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [28] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [29] Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of technological innovation projects
    Rafael Poblano-Ojinaga, Eduardo
    Salcido-Delgado, Aldo
    Alvarado-Iniesta, Alejandro
    Noriega Morales, Salvador
    Arnoldo Rodriguez-Medina, Manuel
    DYNA, 2020, 95 (04): : 351 - 351
  • [30] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270