An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective

被引:81
作者
Astanehe, Arezoo [1 ]
Temple-Oberle, Claire [1 ]
Nielsen, Markus [1 ]
de Haas, William [1 ]
Lindsay, Robert [1 ]
Matthews, Jennifer [1 ]
McKenzie, David C. [1 ]
Yeung, Justin [1 ]
Schrag, Christiaan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rm 382,1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000001634
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a standardized perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care pathway in microsurgical abdominal-based breast reconstruction. Methods: Development of a clinical care pathway was informed by the latest ERAS guideline for breast reconstruction. Key features included shortened preoperative fasting, judicious fluids, multimodal analgesics, early oral nutrition, early Foley catheter removal, and early ambulation. There were 3 groups of women in this cohort study: (1) traditional historical control; (2) transition group with partial implementation; and (3) ERAS. Narcotic use, patient-reported pain scores, antiemetic use, time to regular diet, time to first walk, hospital length of stay, and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: After implementation of the pathway, the use of parenteral narcotics was reduced by 88% (traditional, 112 mg; transition, 58 mg; ERAS, 13 mg; P < 0.0001), with no consequent increase in patient-reported pain. Patients in the ERAS cohort used less antiemetics (7.0, 5.3, 2.2 doses, P < 0.0001), returned to normal diet 19 hours earlier (46, 39, 27 hours, P < 0.0001), and walked 25 hours sooner (75, 70, 50 hours, P < 0.0001). Overall, hospital length of stay was reduced by 2 days in the ERAS cohort (6.6, 5.6, 4.8 days, P < 0.0001), without an increase in rates of major complications (9.5%, 10.1%, 8.3%, P = 0.9). Conclusions: A clinical care pathway in microsurgical breast reconstruction using the ERAS Society guideline promotes successful early recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Is Enhanced Recovery the New Standard of Care in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction?
    Afonso, Anoushka
    Oskar, Sabine
    Tan, Kay See
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Ceyhan, Jihan
    Dayan, Joseph H.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (05) : 1053 - 1061
  • [2] Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction
    Batdorf, Niles J.
    Lemaine, Valerie
    Lovely, Jenna K.
    Ballman, Karla V.
    Goede, Whitney J.
    Martinez-Jorge, Jorys
    Booth-Kowalczyk, Andria L.
    Grubbs, Pamela L.
    Bungum, Lisa D.
    St-Cyr, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (03) : 395 - 402
  • [3] New modalities of pain treatment after outpatient orthopaedic surgery
    Beaussier, M.
    Sciard, D.
    Sautet, A.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (01) : S121 - S124
  • [4] Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery
    Blom, Rachel L. G. M.
    van Heijl, Mark
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Busch, Olivier R. C.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (10) : 2372 - 2378
  • [5] Introducing the fast track surgery principles can reduce length of stay after autologous breast reconstruction using free flaps: A case control study
    Bonde, Christian
    Khorasani, Hoda
    Eriksen, Kirsten
    Wolthers, Mette
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Elberg, Jens
    [J]. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 2015, 49 (06) : 367 - 371
  • [6] Perioperative Optimization of Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Bonde, Christian T.
    Khorasani, Hoda
    Elberg, Jens
    Kehlet, Henrik
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (02) : 411 - 414
  • [7] The impact of clinical pathways on the practice of head and neck oncologic surgery - The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience
    Chen, AY
    Callender, D
    Mansyur, C
    Reyna, KM
    Limitone, E
    Goepfert, H
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (03) : 322 - 326
  • [8] Clarke Linda K, 2002, Clin J Oncol Nurs, V6, P78, DOI 10.1188/02.CJON.78-82
  • [9] Postoperative analgesia and flap perfusion after pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction - continuous wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.2%. A pilot study
    Dagtekin, Oguzhan
    Hotz, Alexandra
    Kampe, Sandra
    Auweiler, Marion
    Warm, Mathias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (05) : 618 - 625
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of a postoperative clinical care pathway in head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction
    Dautremont, Jonathan F.
    Rudmik, Luke R.
    Yeung, Justin
    Asante, Tiffany
    Nakoneshny, Steve C.
    Hoy, Monica
    Lui, Amanda
    Chandarana, Shamir P.
    Matthews, Thomas W.
    Schrag, Christiaan
    Dort, Joseph C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2013, 42