INTERPERSONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF REQUEST STRATEGIES - GENERAL-PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENCES DUE TO CULTURE AND GENDER

被引:134
作者
HOLTGRAVES, T
YANG, JN
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several hypotheses derived from P. Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory were tested with Ss from the United States and Korea. Ss imagined themselves in situations in which they were to make a request. They then indicated exactly what they would say in each situation and what their perceptions of the request size, the hearer's power, and the closeness of their relationship with the hearer were. Consistent with P. Brown and Levinson's theory, power, distance, and size contributed significantly to politeness. Significant predictor variable interactions suggested that an additive model is not appropriate. Finally, there was evidence of cultural and gender differences in the weighting of these predictor variables. These differences can partially account for cultural and gender differences in language use.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 256
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   AN INVESTIGATION OF COMPLIANCE-GAINING AS POLITENESS [J].
BAXTER, LA .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1984, 10 (03) :427-456
[2]  
Blum-Kulka S., 1989, CROSSCULTURAL PRAGMA, P1
[3]  
Blum-Kulka Shoshana, 1985, LANGUAGE SOCIAL SITU, V113-139, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6_7
[4]  
Brown Penelope., 1978, QUESTIONS POLITENESS, P56
[5]  
BROWN Penelope, 1987, POLITENESS SOME UNIV
[6]   POLITENESS THEORY AND SHAKESPEARES 4 MAJOR TRAGEDIES [J].
BROWN, R ;
GILMAN, A .
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 1989, 18 (02) :159-212
[7]   RELATIVE STATUS AND INTERPERSONAL PRESUMPTUOUSNESS [J].
CANSLER, DC ;
STILES, WB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 17 (05) :459-471
[8]   POLITE RESPONSES TO POLITE REQUESTS [J].
CLARK, HH ;
SCHUNK, DH .
COGNITION, 1980, 8 (02) :111-143
[9]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, V2
[10]   ELDERLY SELF-DISCLOSURE - INTERACTIONAL AND INTERGROUP ISSUES [J].
COUPLAND, N ;
COUPLAND, J ;
GILES, H ;
HENWOOD, K ;
WIEMANN, J .
LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION, 1988, 8 (02) :109-133