ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION ABOUT GOALS DURING THE PROCESSING OF NARRATIVE TEXTS

被引:33
作者
DOPKINS, S [1 ]
KLIN, C [1 ]
MYERS, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,DEPT PSYCHOL,AMHERST,MA 01003
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.70
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We used a probe procedure to show that a goal established earlier in a text is active in memory at the point of its achievement. An initial experiment demonstrated that a goal category (began an investigation to nab the THIEF) is accessible, relative to a control condition, following the processing of a goal-achievement sentence (had the PURSER brought to his office). The remaining experiments provided evidence against several explanations of this result: (a) that the goal category's accessibility is due to an advantage in the strength of its initial encoding; (b) that the goal category is maintained in memory from the point at which the goal is established; or (c) that the goal category is reinstated at the point of goal achievement as the result of a high-level inference. The results suggest that the goal category is reinstated as the result of a low-level inference similar to the type that links an anaphor and its antecedent.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 80
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Rumelhart D. E, 1977, BASIC PROCESSES READ, P265
[22]  
Schank R., 1977, SCRIPTS PLANS GOALS
[23]   INFERRING CONSEQUENCES IN STORY COMPREHENSION [J].
SINGER, M ;
FERREIRA, F .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 22 (04) :437-448
[24]  
SUH S, 1991, UNPUB CONVERGING EVI
[25]   CAUSAL RELATEDNESS AND IMPORTANCE OF STORY EVENTS [J].
TRABASSO, T ;
SPERRY, LL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (05) :595-611
[26]   CAUSAL THINKING AND THE REPRESENTATION OF NARRATIVE EVENTS [J].
TRABASSO, T ;
VANDENBROEK, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (05) :612-630
[27]  
Tukey J. W., 1977, EXPLORATORY DATA ANA
[28]  
van den Broek P., 1990, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V25, P175
[29]   CAUSAL NETWORKS VERSUS GOAL HIERARCHIES IN SUMMARIZING TEXT [J].
VANDENBROEK, P ;
TRABASSO, T .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1986, 9 (01) :1-15