Structuring and supporting specialist training in general practice: Evaluation of a Hesse-wide mentoring program for doctors

Introduction: Due to the growing shortage of general practitioners (GPs), solutions are being sought to improve the structure and attraction of specialist training in general practice. In 2012, the Competence Center for Specialist Training in General Practice was set up in the federal state of Hesse, Germany, in order to provide a seminar- and mentoring program to complement standard specialist training. The present paper examines whether the mentoring program, which was based on needs assessment, supports doctors in training (DiT) to become specialists in general practice. Methods: A mixed-methods design was used for the evaluation of the mentoring program. The pilot cohort monitored in this study was surveyed using a guideline-based interview. The cohort consisted of the first cohort of participants in the Specialist Training Academy (n = 21), which was divided into two mentoring groups. Responses were evaluated with the help of the MAXQDA 11 program and qualitative content analysis to structure content. Furthermore, all 16 group meetings were assessed by means of evaluation sheets (n = 132) and analyzed descriptively using the statistics program SPSS (IBM statistics, Version 20). Results: Of the 21 DiTs of the total sample that took part in the interviews, two-thirds of the surveyed mentees were female (71.4 %). The mentoring and seminar programs encouraged the mentees in their decision for and their identification with specialist training in general practice and helped them overcome any doubts about their choice. The decisive factors in the mentoring process were interacting with likeminded people, discussing organizational questions and having a fixed contact person in case of questions and doubts. The evaluation sheets made it clear that the mentees regarded the mentoring as supportive (99.3 % positive). Compared to the other mentoring group, participants in the one group felt they were better supported by mentoring, found the interaction with other DiTs more helpful, the interaction between mentors and the group exactly right, and the topics they discussed more relevant. Conclusion: The provided mentoring program fulfilled the expectations of the DiTs in general practice. Combined with the Specialist Training Academy's seminar program, the two programs complement each other and are an important step towards making specialist training in general practice more attractive.