Linking key environmental stressors with the delivery of provisioning ecosystem services in the freshwaters of southern Africa

被引:35
|
作者
Jackson, Michelle C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Woodford, Darragh J. [2 ,4 ]
Weyl, Olaf L. F. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Zool & Entomol, Ctr Invas Biol, Private Bag X 20, ZA-0028 Hatfield, South Africa
[2] South African Inst Aquat Biodivers, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus,Buckhurst Rd, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[4] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Ctr Invas Biol, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] South African Inst Aquat Biodivers, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
来源
GEO-GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENT | 2016年 / 3卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
climate change; fisheries; freshwater; invasive species; land use change; multiple stressors;
D O I
10.1002/geo2.26
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Societies' growing global footprint is causing a rapid increase in the demand for natural resources (i.e. ecosystem services), while also reducing the capacity of ecosystems to provide them. Freshwater ecosystems contribute disproportionately to ecosystem services but are also particularly vulnerable to global environmental change. The provisioning of freshwater services, such as water and food production, is especially important in developing countries. Here, we review the evidence which demonstrates the impacts of key environmental stressors on these two important provisioning services in southern Africa. Land use change, species invasions and climate change can all be linked to a loss of the provisioning services provided by freshwater ecosystems in southern Africa. Water resources for drinking, agriculture, sanitation and power are expected to decline as a result of both climate and land use change. Fish production may be negatively or positively affected by the different stressors, highlighting the high context-dependency associated with their impacts. Evidence also suggests that these stressors can interact to alter one another's impacts or promote the proliferation of further stressors. For instance, land use change can promote aquatic plant invasions and, subsequently, the stressors may interact synergistically to cause fish kills. Stressors may also interact to mitigate one another's impact, for instance fish invasions may enhance total fish catch following a pollution event. Since stressors are unlikely to occur in isolation and multiple stressors frequently result in complex 'ecological surprises', it is urgent that we increase research effort on the links between multiple stressors and the loss of ecosystem services. Future research should, therefore, focus on the combined impacts of multiple environmental, social, and economic stressors on natural resources and provisioning ecosystem services in southern Africa.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From forage to multifunctionality: shifting perceptions of rangeland ecosystem services in the journals of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa
    Morris, Craig D.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RANGE & FORAGE SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [42] Linking ecosystem services to agri-environmental schemes through SEA: A case study from Northern Italy
    Rega, Carlo
    Spaziante, Agata
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 47 - 53
  • [43] Towards strengthening collaborative ecosystem management: lessons from environmental conflict and political change in southern Africa
    Fabricius, C
    Koch, E
    Magome, H
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2001, 31 (04) : 831 - 844
  • [44] Mapping the Loss of Ecosystem Services in a Region Under Intensive Land Use Along the Southern Coast of South Africa
    Malherbe, Hanlie
    Pauleit, Stephan
    Lorz, Carsten
    LAND, 2019, 8 (03)
  • [45] Protecting HIV service delivery for key populations in southern Africa in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Musuka, Godfrey
    Dzinamarira, Tafadzwa
    Madziva, Roda
    Herrera, Helena
    El Sadr, Wafaa
    IJID REGIONS, 2022, 3 : 114 - 116
  • [46] Deriving double dividends through linking payments for ecosystem services to environmental entrepreneurship: The case of the invasive weed Lantana camara
    Ranjan, Ram
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 164
  • [47] Models of public-private engagement for health services delivery and financing in Southern Africa: a systematic review
    Whyle, Eleanor Beth
    Olivier, Jill
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2016, 31 (10) : 1515 - 1529
  • [48] Numerical weather prediction and climate modelling: Challenges and opportunities for improving climate services delivery in Southern Africa
    Meque, Arlindo
    Gamedze, Sunshine
    Moitlhobogi, Thembani
    Booneeady, Prithiviraj
    Samuel, Sydney
    Mpalang, Letlhogonolo
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 23
  • [49] Risks to the delivery of essential nutrition services in Eastern and Southern Africa in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Moloney, Grainne
    Volege, Marjorie
    Odhiambo, Fanuel
    Bekele, Hana
    Nyawo, Mara
    Chimanya, Kudakwashe
    Rudert, Christiane
    Onyango, Adelheid
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 41
  • [50] The pairwise interaction of environmental factors for ecosystem services relationships in karst ecological priority protection and key restoration areas
    Zuo, Liyuan
    Gao, Jiangboa
    Du, Fujun
    Ecological Indicators, 2021, 131