PERCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF CORTICOSPINAL PATHWAYS AT THE LEVEL OF THE PYRAMIDAL DECUSSATION IN HUMANS

被引:200
作者
UGAWA, Y [1 ]
ROTHWELL, JC [1 ]
DAY, BL [1 ]
THOMPSON, PD [1 ]
MARSDEN, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] INST NEUROL,MRC,HUMAN MOVEMENT & BALANCE UNIT,QUEEN SQ,LONDON WC1N 3BG,ENGLAND
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ana.410290413
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Stimulation over the base of the skull can activate descending motor pathways to produce electromyographic (EMG) responses in muscles of the arm and leg. The evoked EMG responses were larger when the muscles were preactivated by a small voluntary contraction compared to when they were completely relaxed. The latency of these responses in preactivated muscles was approximately midway between that produced by electrical stimulation over the motor cortex, and by electrical stimulation over the cervical enlargements. With horizontally spaced electrodes, the latency difference between cortical and brainstem stimulation was 1.8 milliseconds in all muscles tested. The latency difference between cervical and brainstem stimulation was 3.9 milliseconds for the first dorsal interosseous and 2.6 milliseconds for tibialis anterior muscles. These values suggest that brainstem stimulation occurs at the level of the cervicomedullary junction. With vertically spaced electrodes in the midline, stimulation often occurs at a higher level. The EMG responses from brainstem stimulation differed from those following cortical stimulation in two ways: (1) They were simpler in form, and (2) their onset latency was the same in active as it was in relaxed muscles. This suggests that brainstem stimulation evoked a large descending motor volley in comparison with the multiple volleys that cortical stimulation can produce. Collision experiments between cortical and brainstem volleys indicated that the major part of the responses evoked by brainstem stimulation were conducted via the large-diameter component of the corticospinal tract.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 427
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Impulses in the pyramidal tract
    Adrian, ED
    Moruzzi, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1939, 97 (02): : 153 - 199
  • [2] BROOKHART JM, 1950, RES PUBL ASSOC RES N, V30, P157
  • [3] CENTRAL MOTOR CONDUCTION - METHOD AND NORMAL RESULTS
    CLAUS, D
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (12) : 1125 - 1132
  • [4] MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN .2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS
    DAY, BL
    ROTHWELL, JC
    THOMPSON, PD
    DICK, JPR
    COWAN, JMA
    BERARDELLI, A
    MARSDEN, CD
    [J]. BRAIN, 1987, 110 : 1191 - 1209
  • [5] ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - SURFACE EMG AND SINGLE MOTOR UNIT RESPONSES
    DAY, BL
    DRESSLER, D
    DENOORDHOUT, AM
    MARSDEN, CD
    NAKASHIMA, K
    ROTHWELL, JC
    THOMPSON, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 412 : 449 - 473
  • [6] MARSDEN CD, 1982, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V328, pP6
  • [7] ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OVER THE HUMAN VERTEBRAL COLUMN - WHICH NEURAL ELEMENTS ARE EXCITED
    MILLS, KR
    MURRAY, NMF
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 63 (06): : 582 - 589
  • [8] PHILLIPS CG, 1986, MOVEMENTS HAND, P89
  • [9] MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN .1. GENERAL-CHARACTERISTICS OF EMG RESPONSES IN DIFFERENT MUSCLES
    ROTHWELL, JC
    THOMPSON, PD
    DAY, BL
    DICK, JPR
    KACHI, T
    COWAN, JMA
    MARSDEN, CD
    [J]. BRAIN, 1987, 110 : 1173 - 1190
  • [10] Rothwell JC, 1989, NEUROMONITORING SURG, P71