STS and Researcher Intervention Strategies

被引:6
作者
Martin, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
STS methodology; controversy; vaccination; engagement; dissent;
D O I
10.17351/ests2016.15
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
When I learned about a concerted campaign against Australian vaccination critics, I decided to intervene in the debate. As a result, some proponents of vaccination turned on me, making abusive comments and complaining to university officials. At several points in this experience, I had to make choices about how to intervene or respond. STS perspectives offered valuable insights for understanding the dynamics of the controversy but provided little guidance for making decisions. Some reasons are offered for why STS lacks tools for guiding practical action in such situations.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 66
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
Martin B, 2012, 1 MONDAY PEER REVED, V17
[22]  
Martin B, 2011, CAUGHT VACCINATION W
[23]  
Martin B., 2013, SOCIAL MED, V7, P90
[24]  
Martin B, 2014, BIASED REPORTING VAC
[25]  
Martin B., 2014, CONTROVERSY MANUAL
[26]   Censorship and free speech in scientific controversies [J].
Martin, Brian .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 42 (03) :377-386
[27]   When You're Criticized [J].
Martin, Brian .
JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2012, 43 (02) :230-237
[28]   WHAT KIND OF INQUIRY CAN BEST HELP US CREATE A GOOD WORLD [J].
MAXWELL, N .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1992, 17 (02) :205-227
[29]  
Maxwell N., 1984, KNOWLEDGE WISDOM REV
[30]  
McIntyre A., 2008, PARTICIPATORY ACTION, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781483385679