This article presents and analyses two cases of ethnographic, topicdriven, fieldwork among upper caste, middle-class women in urban India, which is a field dominated by hierarchical social relations of class, caste and gender. The aim is to discuss the methodological challenges we encountered in delineating, 'constructing' (Amit, Vered, 2000, Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, London and New York: Routledge) and getting access to potential field-sites. Prospective informants lived their everyday lives criss-crossing between different types of social arenas within the city, inducing us to take a multi-sited approach (Marcus, George E., 1995, 'Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited Ethnography', Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 24, pp. 95-117). Moreover, these everyday social arenas were clearly demarcated and initially closed to outsiders by physical walls and social distinction, rendering the process of gaining access rather challenging. Here, we discuss these challenges and how we attempted to solve them. A central point is that 'gaining access' for most ethnographic researchers is a long process of meticulous planning, serendipitous encounters and 'dead-ends', that in itself is part of the ethnographic material. Furthermore, we discuss the relational aspect of qualitative research, wherein the researcher 'puts his or her own body on the line' (Okely, Judit, 2012, Anthropological Practice: Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Method, London: Bloomsbury, p.1). We argue that the manner by which the researcher is being positioned by the people studied - processes characterized by resistance, avoidance or even exclusion - often contain rich ethnographic information which must be taken into consideration. By highlighting this, we aim to demystify challenges often overlooked or under-communicated in ethnographic research.
