A SIMPLE, MECHANISTIC MODEL FOR SOIL RESISTANCE TO PLANT WATER-UPTAKE

被引:18
作者
MOLDRUP, P
ROLSTON, DE
HANSEN, JAA
YAMAGUCHI, T
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,DEPT LAND AIR & WATER RESOURCES,DAVIS,CA 95616
[2] HIROSHIMA UNIV,FAC ENGN,DEPT ENVIRONM SCI & ENGN,HIROSHIMA 724,JAPAN
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00010694-199202000-00001
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A simple, mechanistic model for soil resistance (R(S)) to water flow towards plant roots is presented. This new R(S) model is derived from a single root, water flow model and assumes constant soil hydraulic conductivity within the rhizosphere for each combination of depth and time increment in the calculations. The new R(S) model takes into account root density, soil hydraulic conductivity, and soil-water capacity. The effect of the soil-water capacity is included by either i) using the slope of the curve representing the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity versus the soil-water potential in a log-log coordinate system as a dynamic model parameter or ii) if the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity is not measured, by using the slope of the soil-water characteristic curve in a log-log coordinate system as a dynamic model parameter. The latter approach is based on the validity of the so-called Alexander capillary tube model for water flow. The new R(S) model is compared with the traditionally used R(S) model based on steady-state flow. The two R(S) models give different results for both clayey and sandy soils. The differences are mainly due to the effect of the soil-water characteristic curves. The new R(S) model is mechanistically more appropriate than the steady-state based R(S) model because it includes the effect of the soil-water capacity, i.e., the soils ability to withhold water at given pressure gradient. The new R(S) model should be useful in obtaining simple, mechanistic, micro-computer models for plant uptake of water.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER L, 1986, T ASAE, V29, P176, DOI 10.13031/2013.30123
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF TEXTURE ON THE RESISTANCE TO WATER-MOVEMENT WITHIN THE RHIZOSPHERE [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
CAMPBELL, GS ;
CALISSENDORFF, C .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (02) :266-270
[3]   SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING UNSATURATED CONDUCTIVITY FROM MOISTURE RETENTION DATA [J].
CAMPBELL, GS .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 117 (06) :311-314
[4]  
COWAN I. R., 1965, J APPL ECOL, V2, P221, DOI 10.2307/2401706
[5]  
HANSEN G K, 1974, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, V24, P37
[6]  
HANSEN G K, 1974, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, V24, P83
[7]   COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-SIMULATION MODELS FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL INFILTRATION [J].
HAVERKAMP, R ;
VAUCLIN, M ;
TOUMA, J ;
WIERENGA, PJ ;
VACHAUD, G .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (02) :285-294
[8]   WATER-UPTAKE BY PLANTS .2. ROOT CONTACT MODEL [J].
HERKELRATH, WN ;
MILLER, EE ;
GARDNER, WR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (06) :1039-1043
[9]  
JACOBSEN BF, 1974, ACTA AGR SCAND, V24, P55
[10]   LEAF GAS-EXCHANGE AND WATER RELATIONS OF LUPINS AND WHEAT .2. ROOT AND SHOOT WATER RELATIONS OF LUPIN DURING DROUGHT-INDUCED STOMATAL CLOSURE [J].
JENSEN, CR ;
HENSON, IE ;
TURNER, NC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 16 (05) :415-428