EFFECT OF INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE AND MAGNESIUM SULPHATE USED AS ADJUVANTS WITH BUPIVACAINE IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY: A COMPARISON

被引:1
作者
Choudhury, Biswadeep [1 ]
Pathak, Deba Gopal [1 ]
Chauhan, Ram Chandraji [1 ]
Singha, L. Chandralekha [1 ]
Mondal, Debashish [1 ]
机构
[1] Silchar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Cachar, Assam, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2016年 / 5卷 / 68期
关键词
Intrathecal; Nalbuphine; Magnesium Sulphate; Postop Analgesia;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2016/1118
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Nalbuphine, a semi-synthetic, mixed agonist-antagonist opioid, has a potential to attenuate the mu-opioid effects and to enhance the kappa-opioid effects. The use of different adjuvants including Nalbuphine with local anaesthetics extends the duration of surgical anaesthesia including postoperative analgesia. METHODS Randomised, double blinded, case control study conducted in 100 adult ASA I and II patients divided randomly into two groups of 50 each undergoing lower abdominal surgeries Group M received (100 mg/0.2 mL) 50% preservative free Magnesium Sulfate and Group N received (0.8 mg/0.2 mL) 0.4% Nalbuphine along with 3 mL of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine each intrathecally. RESULT The onset of T10 sensory block 5.75 +/- 0.74 min. in group M and 4.20 +/- 0.67 min. in group N, which is significantly faster in group N (p<0.0001). Time of regression to S1 sensory level is 199.44 +/- 10.41 min. in group M and 154.84 +/- 8.11 min. in group N, which is prolonged in group M (p<0.0001). The mean time for rescue analgesia in group M is 241.06 +/- 19.61 minutes and group N is 257.30 +/- 28.50 min., which is statistically significant (P value=0.0013), i.e. prolonged postoperative analgesia in group N. CONCLUSION Nalbuphine has faster onset of anaesthesia and provides prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to magnesium sulphate when used as adjuvants with bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:4922 / 4926
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Apeksha P., 2014, INT J RES MED, V3, P7
[2]  
Charuluxananan S, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V93, P162
[3]   Advantages of intrathecal nalbuphine, compared with intrathecal morphine, after cesarean delivery: An evaluation of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects [J].
Culebras, X ;
Gaggero, G ;
Zatloukal, J ;
Kern, C ;
Marti, RA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (03) :601-605
[4]   Analgesia from a peripherally active κ-opioid receptor agonist in patients with chronic pancreatitis [J].
Eisenach, JC ;
Carpenter, R ;
Curry, R .
PAIN, 2003, 101 (1-2) :89-95
[5]   A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after cesarean section [J].
Gomaa, Hala Mostafa ;
Mohamed, Nashwa Nabil ;
Zoheir, Heba Allah Hussein ;
Ali, Mohamad Saeid .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (04) :405-410
[6]  
Gutstein HB, 2006, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P547
[7]  
Jyothi B, 2014, INDIAN J PAIN, V28, P18, DOI [10.4103/0970-5333.128881, DOI 10.4103/0970-5333.128881]
[8]  
Khezri Marzieh-Beigom, 2012, Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, V50, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.aat.2012.03.001
[9]  
Merskey NB, 1994, CLASSIFICATION CHRON, P209
[10]  
Miller R., 2010, MILLERS ANAESTHESIA, V1